tment
d the
Much
hat a
aneous
height
f the
d and
ts was
ations
on of
formed
models
S ago
ied to
rs and
a. The
elated
nomial
ms can
everal
ns for
ated:
gps
X ik
gps
Y
gps
Zik
f the
trip
strip
r the
(shift
r the
tion)
r the
tic
es
the
he
of
For the stochastic model of the observations, the
following assumptions were made: the observations
are not correlated, while the weights of the GPS
observations and the observations of the ground
control points are evaluated with respect to the
weight unit of the photogrammetric observations.
The observation equations listed above, together
vith those derived from the seven-parameter
solution, are adjusted simultaneously.
TESTING THE STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF GPS
PARAMETERS
The test of significance of the GPS parameters was
to determine if the parameter values were
significantly different from zero and/or if
parameter groups were significantly different from
each other. In this way insignificant parameters
are either eliminated from the adjustments or
grouped with other parameters: thus over-
parametrization of the system is avoided.
The tests of significance were formulated as
statistical hypotheses and are tested using the
test quantities developed in [3].
A null hypothesis which indicates that the
parameter values are not significantly different
from zero can be written as
Hoc: BYGLY 30
When testing the significance between groups of
parameters (e.g., different GPS parameters
introduced per strip), a null hypothesis, which
assumes that the parameters in group 1 are not
significantly different from the parameters of
group 2, can be formulated as
Ho Foil gi] s isl. 4m
where
m
Gi
E(.)
number of parameters in the groups
the parameter values
indicates mathematical expectation
superscripts 1 and 2 show the
parameter groups
To assess the test statistics, the weight
coefficient matrix of the GPS parameters should be
evaluated, by applying Gaussian reduction in the
reduced normal equations. In this way the GPS
parameters are orthogonalized with respect to
model orientation parameters and their weight
coefficient matrix can be isolated.
TEST DATA
Using both simulated and real data photogrammetric
independent model blocks could be generated at
different scales, with different measuring errors
and randomly generated model orientation
parameters, while the GPS data could be produced
with different observation errors and with
different kinds of systematic errors modelled with
constant, linear and quadratic terms and their
combinations.
The real data were taken from the "Flevoland" test
field in The Netherlands (the flight took place on.
June 1987). The block consisted of 16 parallel
strips, each with a length of approximately 4 km.
A Wild RC 10 aerial camera with a focal length of
213.67 mm was used (photo scale 1:3800).
The photogrammetric measurements were carried out
on a Kern DSR1 analytical plotter and the
independent models were analytically formed.
The GPS instrumentation consisted of two Sercel
receivers, one stationary NR52 receiver at a known
reference point (see fig. 1) and one TR5SB
receiver onboard the aircraft.
The coordinates of the ground control points were
determined using both conventional geodetic
methods and GPS. Further information and detailed
analysis of the block data can be found in
[6,10,11]..
À part of the block consisting of four strips with
15 to 18 models per strip (66 models in total) was
used for the experiments. The part of the block
and the available control points are shown in
figure 1 by the dashed lines.
LARSERPAD
VOGELWEG
A A A à
RE
| GOOISE WEG
DE
a Ground control point
Q Stationary GPS receiver
Figure 1. The test field "Flevoland"
EXPERIMENTS AND THEIR ANALYSIS
A number of experiments were carried out with
simulated data to test the mathematical and
stochastic models and the computer programs, and
to verify and enhance the conclusions drawn from
the experiments with the real data.
The findings of these experiments were
incorporated in the analysis of the experiments
with the real data. Here the results of two
experiments related to the testing of the
significance of the GPS modelling parameters are
presented.
In the first experiment, a block of two strips
with 10 models per strip was generated. It was
controlled with four XYZ points at the block
corners and a chain of height control points at
both the beginning and end of the block. The
generated GPS data contain constant and linear
terms, The adjustments were performed using
constant (CT), linear (LT) and quadratic (QT)
stripwise modelling, i.e., a total of 18
parameters were used.
The three groups of parameters were tested per
strip for their significance according to the
statistical tests developed in [3]: the results
are given in table 1.
505