Full text: XVIIth ISPRS Congress (Part B4)

‘or SPOT 
ges are 
ing the 
it is 
epipolar 
of SPOT 
airs of 
n, 1987) 
8 problem. 
ata. Zhou 
in which 
arranged 
fitting 
e Zhou s 
tion and 
images 
as a 
188 not 
image to 
level 
ipproach 
or left 
| master 
nomial 
ted by 
ponding 
tic or 
e test 
riation 
by the 
viously 
cessing 
ly the 
D. So 
cessing 
ts for 
y a few 
irallax 
Ig." "in 
lax is 
i0 the 
id be 
image 
mented 
4. 
rallax 
id be 
the 
n the 
T image, 
tching 
r and 
4, INTERSECTION AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS 
RESUILTS 
It should be noted that the elevation of grid 
point is calculated by using the exterior 
orientation elements of the line in which the 
corresponding image point is located. According 
to the new data organization method, the 
following preparation must be made before 
intersection: the conjugat points coordinates 
are those of original image coordinates system, 
the exterior orientation elements of central 
line and its variation rate have been 
calcalated, the set of the grid points must 
form essentially orthophoto cases, 
Tab.3 illustrates the erperiment results of 
elevation information extraction from test area 
1. It can be seen that RMS in three dimentional 
direction are all less than 10 m, which is 
calealated in 23 check points. 
6. CONCLUSION 
It is feasible to utilise the SPOT stereopairs 
to extract the elevation information by means 
of fully digital processing manner. In the 
solution of exterior orientation elements, some 
techniques which can be applied to improve the 
accuracy of the solution should be taken into 
use. Multilevel image matching is implenented 
effectively and reliably, especialy, the 
modified LSM algorithms (SLSM&DPFM) are proved 
to be better than tranditional LSM algorithm 
in some extent. Intersection is carried out in 
regular grid to produce DEM directly which 
avoid the interpolation procedure and eliminate 
the accuracy loss in interpolation. Consequently, 
the accuracy of elevation extracted by fully 
digital processing manner can reach 10 m, as 
long as the the quality of image is assured. 
  
  
  
  
  
Direction | RMS (m | 
X | 9.1 | 
Y 8.5 
Z | 9.9 i 
  
  
Table: 3 Accuracy Test for Intersection 
REFERENCE 
Ackermann, F., 1983. High Precision Digital 
Image Correlation . Proceedings of 39th 
Photogrammetric Week, Stuttgart. 
Dowman, I.J., etal., 1987. Digital Processing 
of SPOT Data, Proceedings on Fast Processing 
of Photogrammetric Data . Interlaken , 
Switzerland, PP. 318-330. 
Multi-information and 
Mnlti-criterion Image Matching. Acta 
Geodetica et Cartographica Sinica, No. 2, 
PP. 109-114. (English version) 
Lin Zongjian, 1988. 
Tao Chuang, Lin Zongjian, 1992. Multi-level 
Image Matching for SPOT Data. Remote Sensing 
of Environment, Vol. 7, No.2, (in Chinese) 
Zhou Yueqin, 1988. A New Approach to Arrange 
the Approximate Epipolar Lines for SPOT 
images. Acta Geodetica et Cartographica 
Sinica, No.2, PP.46-61. (English version) 
Zhang Zuxun, Zhou Yueqin. 1988. The Solution 
of Exterior Orientation Elements for SPOT 
Images. Journal of Science and Technology, 
Wuhan, No.2. (in Chinese) 
  
I 
registration rectification 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
| size 
image pairs 
(pixel? control points check points control points 
| = 
nua. Ox gy num. OX Oy nun. Cx Cy 
| 1024 | 
test area 1| 741024 9-0.35 0.93 983. 0.68 2.04. 
| pixel pixel pixel pixel 
test area 2| 12310 5! 9 0.32 0,7 355 0.57 1.29 6 1,24 2.94 
| < 1100 | pixel pixel pixel pixel | (m) (m) 
Table:1 Accuracy of registration and rectification 
| LSM SLSM | PDFM 
window | ; 
size iteration cpu-tize accuracy iteration cpu-tine accuracy | iteration ocpu-liue accuracy 
(pixel) tines (second) (pixel? times (selond) (pixel) tines (second) (pixel) 
8x9 5.00 1.44 2.24 3.00 0.12 1.41 | 2.48 0.93 1.85 
1313 5.30 2.13 1.53 i 2.33 0.16 1.23 | 2.78 0.58 1.46 
1717 5.20 4.02 1.19 | 2.58 0.23 1.01 2.00 2.05 1.11 
25x25 4.40 6.85 0.77 2.57 9.39 0.94 2.40 3.31 0.74 
33 x33 4.80 10.73 0.52 2.68 0.60 0.88 | 2.68 5.40 0.50 
  
  
  
  
  
Table:2 Comparison on iteration times» cpu-time and accuracy 
( NOTE: the values in the table are the average results of 119 matching points) 
877 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.