sang Table 1: Evaluation of three algorithms using simulated DEM 
an 
, and 
hay 1 riterion c tic 
i 0. : .00216 
as 
eR 0.18911 0.09437 0.08900 
arch, 0.03526 
onded seco 7 
cM. vis zation 
tered 
next 
. The 
ng a 
omial 
angle 
for a 
| two 
nvex 
y the 
ds. If 
, the 
worth 
ess of 
peak, 
riate 
alues 
ACM 
  
rdon, 
s, J. 
- and 
[ath., 
rface 
-194. 
d for 
ation 
  
Figure 2b: Linear surface interpolation Figure 2d: Quintic surface interpolation 
933