Full text: XVIIth ISPRS Congress (Part B5)

     
   
   
   
  
   
  
  
  
  
   
   
     
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
    
  
  
  
  
Small isolated holes 
in a thresholded area 
Fig.9. Noise reduction by filling small holes 
3.4 Detailed Positioning 
Each vector of cracks must be centered in 
thresholded area, as the location of 
mapped vectors have ambiguity. Fig. 10 
shows a schema of positioning process. 
In this processing location of a crack 
vector is shifted. into the midpoint 
between both sides of intersection which 
are determined by the cross section at 
right angle of crack direction. Further- 
more, the vector mapped on an isolated 
area is moved to the area on which the 
majority of vectors have been mapped. 
» WN 
|. An edge of a crack area 
> Direction of crack 
  
  
  
  
  
  
A : An intersection point on 
an edge of a crack area 
B : The initially mapped point 
of a crack vector 
C : The midpoint between A 
and B 
D : An intersection point on 
an edge of a crack area 
  
  
  
  
Fig. 10. À schema of detailed positioning by centering 
3.5 Measurement of crack width 
Crack width are measured at the location 
of each crack vector, which is defined as 
a diameter of an inscribed circle of the 
thresholded area shown in Fig. 11. 
Crack width is defined 
as a diameter of an 
inscribed circle. 
Fig. 11. A definition of crack width 
4. THE TEST OF THE ALGORITHM 
Hierarchical image processing algorithm 
has been examined with 18 samples of 
concrete crack images. In the test the 
resolution of finest image is 0.025 mm 
per a pixel. Results of the measurement 
can be evaluated by the two indices. One 
is an index of extraction which is a 
ratio the length of extracted cracks to 
the total length of existing cracks. The 
other is RMS error in crack width  meas- 
urement. 
Table 1 shows the summary of results, and 
Fig. 12 shows one of the coarsest image 
examined and its outcome of crack meas- 
urement. The result shows that the crack 
recognition has been achieved in the mean 
of extraction ratio 66 % and the width 
measurement done with accuracy of the 
mean of RMS error 0.08 mm. 
Table. | The summary of results of the test 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
d ui m e LL 9 rt oe n RMS error 
(cm) (X) rm 
1 38.63 31.00 80.2| 0.11 (20 
2 41. 47 23. 12 55.8| 0.07 (20 
3 25. 65 20. 49 19.9| 0.06 (20) 
4 183. 27 103. 77 56.6 | 0.14 (20) 
5 209. 99 123. 50 58.8 | 0.04 (19) 
6 301. 75 245. 90 81.51 0.17 (38) 
7 290. 82 67.83 23.31 0.05 (20) 
8 156. 24 105. 75 67.71 0.05 (19) 
9 428. 60 210. 64 49.1 | 0.06 (33) 
10 71.22 51. 78 72.7| 0.04 (16) 
11 63. 06 53. 50 84.8| 0.08 (20) 
12 55. 07 38. 99 70.8 | 0.05 (20) 
13 30. 36 27.81 91.6| 0.11 (20 
14 46.87 40. 16 85.7 | 0.05 (20) 
15 31.21 20. 22 64.7| 0.08 (20) 
16 25. 16 19. 29 76.7| 0.09 (20) 
17 39. 75 22. 02 55.4| 0.06 (20) 
18 31. 33 12. 29 39.2| 0.05 (20) 
mean valuc 66.4| 0.08 
  
  
  
  
  
X) Number in () indicates the number of samples. 
      
  
  
  
   
  
  
   
   
   
  
  
   
     
   
    
   
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.