ation
(See
> pro-
ran-
ns of
ome-
n ob-
ernal
:xter-
nd in
rien-
ment
by a
yosed
thin.
ICY is
sfor-
naly-
cause
ITOW
'es in
npar-
[
tics of
le im-
ed un-
.5 and
right affine image
left affine image
small object
Figue-5 : a stereopair of affine images employed
for the free network adjustment
third affine image
first affine image
small object
Figue-6 : three overlapped affine images employed
for the free network adjustment
Simulation Model II
size of object : 100 x 100 x50 mm
number of overlapped affine images : 3
convergent angles : -30deg., Odeg., +30deg.
standard error of measured image
coordinates : 5micrometers
number of control points : 5
number of check points : 20
The free network theory is essentially a linear the-
ory. Thus, we must have fairly good approxima-
tions for unknowns, because the basic equations
(Equation 1) are non-linear with respect to the ori-
entation parameters and object space coordinates.
Further, the free network solution needs an itera-
tive approach in order to obtain a very high exter-
nal accuracy. This comes from the fact that the
solutions obtained in the free network adjustment
are not unbiased estimates of both the orientation
parameters at the exposure instants and the real ob-
ject space coordinates but depend mathematically
on the given approximations. In this method, the
first approximations were calculated by contami-
nating the control point coordinates with random
errors having a standard deviation of 15 microme-
321
ters. Then, the iterative calculation of the free
network adjustment was performed by regarding
the solutions obtained in the (i-1)th step as the ap-
proximations in the i-th step and replacing only the
approximations of the control point coordinates by
the true values.
The obtained results regarding the standard error
of unit weight, the average internal error at the 20
check points and the average external error are
shown in Tables-2 and 3. From these tables the
following characteristics may be extracted for the
free network adjustment of overlapped affine im-
ages:
1) The geometry of the stereopair of affine im-
ages in Simulation Model I is rather weak.
Thus, the average internal and external errors
of the particular solutions with fixed control
points are about twice as large as the theoreti-
particular free network
solution solution
standard error
of unit weight 5.3 um 5.3 um
average
internal error | 13-3 um 7.7 um
average
external error 11.2 um 9.7 um
Table-2: the obtained results for Simulation
Model I
particular free network
solution solution
standard error
of unit weight | 4.7 Um 4.7 pm
average
internal error | 7.1 um 4.1 um
average
external error 6.2 pm 5.8 um
Table-3: the obtained results for Simulation
Model II
cal ones. However, employing three over-
lapped affine images, the obtained average ex-
ternal error of the particular solutions is al-
most identical to the theoretical one.
2) Applying the free network adjustment, great
improvements are recognized in the internal
precision. On the other hand, the improve-
ments in the external precision are 13 percents
for the weak geometry of the stereopair of
affine images and only six percents for the
strong geometry.
3) The solution sometimes diverged when very
high weights are given on the free network
constraints(Equation 12).