Full text: XVIIth ISPRS Congress (Part B5)

    
m accuracy for 
fied. For this 
ly 700mm and 
rious locations 
different spatial 
1easured using 
achine (CMM). 
and cylindrical, 
rement. 
ig a sub-pixel 
ellipse-shaped 
ge coordinates 
program which 
st. 
ed in different 
meras, without 
‘a and various 
ns of cameras 
images 
ries between 2 
s from different 
ers show the 
f observations. 
Its of different 
in deviation is 
and maximum 
| the calculated 
d the nominal 
    
  
a 
N 
; 
3 obs > 3 obs 
nts 
era and rotations; 
ages per point; 3 
n three images 
These results make clear that the maximum deviations 
are always less than O.imm if more than three 
observations are used for 3D point measurement. If the 
minimum number of two images is used for point 
measurement, the maximum differences are always less 
than 0.2mm. 
A similar interpretation of the results can be made for the 
effect of different imaging configurations. Optimal ray 
intersection angles are obtained if different cameras are 
combined with different rotations. It is obvious that a 
reliable and accurate point determination depends on the 
intersection angle in space. For combined measurement 
sufficient results can be obtained even with 2 or 3 
images. Using other configurations the maximum 
deviations are again less than 0.2mm. 
The investigation of distance accuracy show that higher 
accuracies (< 0.1mm) can be achieved if suitable 
configurations of sensors and rotations are used. If less 
accuracy is required (< 0.2mm), one can work with the 
minimum number of images using 2 or 3 observations. 
4. SUMMARY 
The prototype installation of the Programmable Optical 
Measuring System (POM) is equipped with three Rollei 
RSC digital high-resolution cameras and a digital rotary 
table. The calibration of the system and its accuracy in 
this configuration were investigated. 
System calibration and orientation is performed using a 
non-calibrated testfield with retro-reflective targets 
combined with calibrated spatial distances within the 
measuring volume. With a set of 24 images the complete 
calibration of interior and exterior orientation of the 
cameras and the rotary table is provided. The self- 
calibrating bundle adjustment leads to an RMS (sigma 0) 
of 1.5um, and an accuracy of 0.04mm in object space. 
Repeated measurements of targets have been carried 
out in order to judge the inner accuracy and stability of 
the RSC sensors. These tests have shown that a high 
accuracy of < 1.0um in image space is permanently 
achievable. This result is even confirmed if the rotary 
table is involved. This inner accuracy leads to an 
accuracy of < 30pm in object space. 
The measurements of calibrated distances show that the 
final accuracy of the system is less than the calibration 
results from bundle adjustment if a spatial intersection is 
applied under practical conditions. The specified 
accuracy of 0.1mm for a distance measurement can be 
obtained if a larger number of images ( > 3) or a 
sufficient image configuration (different cameras and 
turntable rotations) is used. With the minimum number of 
observations (2-3 images) the resulting accuracy is 
always better than 0.2mm. 
  
   
   
    
   
    
   
     
   
   
    
    
    
  
    
   
    
     
   
    
   
  
    
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
    
   
  
  
  
     
   
    
   
     
  
  
   
The results from calibration process are better than those 
from practical measurements, showing that there is still a 
possibility of improving system accuracy. Additional 
effects (temperature changes, longterm characteristics, 
different algorithms, influences of light) will be 
investigated in the near future. 
It has been shown that an accuracy of < 0.1mm in an 
object space of about 2.0m x 2.0m x 0.6m can be 
obtained. The relative system accuracy ranges between 
1:20,000 (for spatial intersection) and 1:40,000 (using 
bundle adjustment) of object size. 
REFERENCES 
Andresen.K., Helsch,R., 1990: Calculation of Analytical 
Elements in Space Using Contour Algorithms. ISPRS 
Symposium Comm. V, Zürich. 
Hinsken,L., 1989: CAP - Ein Programm zur kombinierten 
Bündelausgleichung auf Personal-Computern. BuL 3/89. 
Loser,R., Luhmann,T., 1992: The Programmable Optical 
3D Measuring System POM - Applications and 
Performance. ISPRS Congress, Comm. V, Washington. 
Luhmann, T., 1990: An Integrated System for Real-time 
and On-line Applications in Industrial Photogrammetry. 
Symposium ISPRS Comm. V, Zürich. 
Riechmann,W., 1990: The Reseau-Scanning Camera 
System; Conception and First Measurement Results. 
Symposium ISPRS Comm. V, Zürich. 
Wester-Ebbinghaus,W., 1985: Verfahren zur 
Feldkalibrierung von photogrammetrischen 
Aufnahmekammern im Nahbereich. Arbeitstagung 
Kammerkalibrierung in der photogrammetrischen Praxis, 
Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe B, Nr. 275, 
pp. 106 - 114, München. 
Zhou, G., 1986: Accurate Determination of Ellipse 
Centers in Digital Imagery. ASPRS Annual Convention, 
Vol. 4, March 1986.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.