Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B2)

  
intervention for tie point measurement. The robust block ad- 
the images show wooded, rural or city areas. 
justments carried out by PAT-B eliminated approximately 4% 
of the tie points determined automatically, regardless whether 
PHODIS AT currently needs approximately 6 minutes for 
measuring an image on a Silicon Graphics Workstation with 
R4400 processor and 200 MHz. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Since the time for the digital aerotriangulation is derived, 20% 
error margin is added. Despite this addition, great time differ- 
ence can be found. Considering that much of the given time is 
pure computing time (eg. image scanning with autowinder, 
pyramid generation, automatic interior orientation, automatic 
tie point determination) by the digital aerotriangulation meas- 
urement, it becomes even more obvious how economic the 
digital aerotriangulation by PHODIS AT is. 
Block preparation and measurement for 659 images: 
Table 4 
Hours 
30 
Area cation 105 
Point transfer 600 
Data ent 25 
Measurement (* 1200 (220 
Total 1960 (980 
  
* The 1200 hours result from special demands. In normal 
cases, one can expect to measure up to 3 images per hour 
which results in 220 hours. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 3 
Forssa | Moeck | Graz | Echallens 
No. of Images 28 15 12 9 
Resolution 15 15 28 20 
Oo (um) 6.4 6.9 8.4 4.1 
Co (um) 3-3 7 XD) 
(analytisch) 23.0(E) 
Image scale 4000 7000 4000 5500 
Focal length 153 153 305 153 
No. of GCPs SS 7 36 10 
No. of tie points 
6-fold 31 19 4 11 
5-fold 49 48 26 20 
4-fold 228 133 102 68 
3-fold 1238 1003 819 434 
2-fold 3732 1862 2701 1509 
Image 2.42 2,8] 3.35 1.89 
rms x/y (um) 3.74 3.92 5.62 2.68 
Object 0.015 | 0.016 0.028 0.013 
rms x/y/z 0.016 | 0.012 0.025 0.012 
(m) 0.022 | 0.018 0.047 0.015 
  
  
  
  
  
  
P = planimetry; E = elevation (computed by PAT-M) 
When considering the adjustment results, one can focus on os. 
o, indicates the accuracy of the automatically measured points 
and can be used for comparision with that of an analytical 
aerotriangulation. The analytically determined values given in 
Table 3 were obtained at those points marked by a point trans- 
fer instrument. The accuracy of digital aerotriangulation 
amounts to ca. 0.2 to 0.3 pixel size. The digitally determined 
exterior orientations are clearly more reliable than that of the 
analytically determined ones because they are obtained with a 
much heigher redundancy. It shows in Table 3 that the larger 
the overlap is (eg. block Echallens), the better the block ad- 
justment results, which has already been known for a long time 
from the block adjustment theory. 
Our tests have shown that the accuracy of block adjustment 
does not decrease linearly with the resolution of the images. 
Halfing the image resolution (e.g. 30um instead of 151m) 
results in an accuracy loss of ca. '^4. This can be explained by 
the large number of points, which ensures that the result is 
very stable despite the reduced resolution. This is true for good 
image material. If the quality of the image material is poor, the 
loss of accuracy can be larger, which can be shown by the 
block Forssa. An adjustment accuracy of o, — 11.9 was ob- 
tained for this block with an image resolution of 30 um. 
For the block Graz we have detailed information on the time 
and costs for an analytical aerotriangulation (Ganster/Xu, 
1994). If one considers only the time for analytical measure- 
ment (Table 4) and compares it with the derived time for the 
digital aerotriangulation conducted by PHODIS AT (Table 5), 
it becomes clear how economic the digital aerotriangulation 
can be. 
Table 5 
Digitally Hours 
Scanning 165 (15 min/image) 
Data management 220 (20 min/image) 
Block definition 8 
  
Pyramids computation 33 (3min/image) 
  
Automatic interior orientation 11 (1 min/image) 
  
  
  
  
  
Automatic measurement 66 (6 min/image) 
GCP measurement & adjust- 60 (4 min/point) 
ment (**) 
Total 555 + 20% = 666 
  
  
(**) In the block there are 909 GCPs. Four minutes per GCP 
are assumed. This is very liberal especially when considering 
that PHODIS AT can guide operator to the GCPs after a first 
block adjustment. System-guided GCP measurement does not 
require more than 2 minutes per point. 
7 Conclusion and Outlook 
PHODIS AT is a new system available on the market that 
performs fully automatic tie point determination and semiau- 
tomatic control point measurement for aerotriangulation. 
PHODIS AT is already proving itself in practical use. The high 
degree of automation makes aerotriangulation more economic. 
The vision is near at hand that a chain can be build up which 
allows automatic image scanning, automatic aerotriangulation, 
automatic DEM and orthoimage generation, and even auto- 
matic stereoscopic or monoscopic data aquisition for geo- 
graphic information systems. These prospects are very promis- 
ing and can be achieved already in the near future. 
References: 
Ackermann, F., 1983. High Precision Digital Image Correlation. 
Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Photogrammetrie der Universität Stuttgart, 
Heft 9, 231-243. 
Ackermann, F., 1995. Automatic Aerotriangulation. In Proceedings 2nd 
Course in Digital Photogrammetry, Bonn. 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B2. Vienna 1996 
Ackeı 
tion. / 
Ganst 
Magi: 
Gülct 
grami 
IfP, 1 
(IfP), 
Autor 
Stuttg 
Mayr. 
gramt 
Schen 
Photo 
Scher 
Systei 
Tang, 
Geoir 
Tang, 
tation 
Wichi 
Tang, 
Image 
47-55 
Tang, 
matic 
accep 
Toth, 
Autor 
tion, [ 
Tsing 
Aeria 
214. 
Tsing 
angul: 
Münc
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.