Map
indcovers
"Vers
ated by the
ation.
((k,i))^
k: Study site ID
N(k): Number of landcovers in the study site (k)
A(k,i): Estimated area ratio of landcover(i) in the study
site(k) by classification
Ar(k,i):Actual area ratio of landcover(i) in the study
site(k)
By introducing the estimated area ratios of
landcovers as a priori probabilities, the
accuracy of landcover classification was
significantly improved. The RMS errors of
landcover area ratios in each small study site
by Bayes' classification were less than those
estimated only by maximum likelihood
estimation.
5. Discussion & Conclusion
The results of the experiment to estimate
the landcover area ratios as a priori
probabilities of landcovers showed that the
quality of training data affects the accuracy
of landcover area ratios. So, a new algorithm
like an experiment[Yoshino(1995)] is needed
to be developed in order to determine proper
training data sets.
As a result of this research, the
following are concluded.
1) An algorithm to decompose mixed data can be
used to estimate the area ratios of landcovers
in the study area as a priori probabilities
for the Bayes' classifier.
2) The area ratios of landcovers were
estimated fairly well by the algorithm of the
decomposition of mixed data.
3) Introducing estimated area ratios of
landcovers as a priori probabilities for the
Bayes' classifier resulted in better accuracy
of landcover classification by maximum
likelihood classification.
4) It was found that this new algorithm to
estimate area ratios of landcovers in the
study area strongly requires very good
training data in the study area.
5) Estimating the number of proper landcovers
for the study area and selecting good training
signatures are very important.
6) A new procedure to determine proper
training datasets for the estimation of
landcover area ratios must be developed.
7) The results of this research will be very
useful for hyper multispectral images like
AVIRIS data.
This research was supported by the
Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from the
Japan Science Society in 1995. We are greatly
indebted to many students in the department of
agricultural engineering of the University of
Tokyo for their assistance at the time of the
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B3. Vienna 1996
DN OMEN Je.
ground truth.
Reference
1)Inamura,Minoru: Analysis of Remotely Sensed
Image Data by means of Category Decomposition,
Trans. of the Institute of Electronics,
Information and Communication Engineers,
Vol.J70-C(2),pp.241-250,
1987
2)Ito,Tadashi and Sadao Fujimura: Estimation
of Cover Area of Each Category in a Pixel by
Pixel Decomposition into Categories, Trans. of
the Society of Instrument and Control
Engineers Vol.23(8),p.20-25,1987
3)Matsumoto,Masao, Kouki Fujiku, Kiyoshi
Tsuchiya,Kohei Arai: Category Decomposition
based on Maximum Likelihood Estimation,
Journal of the Japan Society of
Photogrammetry, Vol.30(2), p.25-34,1991
4)strahler, Alan H,:. The Use of Prior
Probabilities in Maximum Likelihood
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data, Remote
Sensing of Environment 10, pp.135-163, 1980
5)Yoshino, Kunihiko: One procedure to
determine landcover categories for landcover
supervised classification in remotely sensed
image, Proc. of the annual conference of Japan
Society of Irrigation and Drainage,
Reclamation Engineering, p.82-83, 1995
997