Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B3)

   
   
  
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
   
  
   
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
    
   
    
  
  
  
   
   
  
   
  
   
   
   
  
   
  
  
  
  
   
    
ımber of cycle slips, or 
satellite geometry, was 
quent kinematic OTF 
ncies for widelaning, a 
'stablished, which then 
1cy processing. During 
ellites were visible, the 
/cle slip detection. The 
y interpolated to obtain 
e time. 
| sensors, a comparison 
derived from GPS/INS 
stment could be made. 
5 have RMS values of 
. Since the separation 
rers was within 10 km, 
ue to the small number 
configuration. In order 
tion satellites had to be 
evation mask as low as 
:eously tracked by both 
  
  
50 60 
) 
. height 
Camera Position 
  
SM Mae 
Li 
* 
" * 
3 A Y 
? 
3" 
  
  
  
azimuth 
  
'amera Orientation 
rameters are depicted in 
roll, pitch and azimuth. 
rm due to the fact that 
short time periods when 
1a 1996 
flying over the test field. The errors in azimuth are randomly 
distributed with standard deviations (STD) of 0.015? over the whole 
mission. This implies that the dominant systematic errors in 
INS-derived attitude have been almost completely eliminated by 
frequent GPS updates. These updates should be theoretically more 
effective in roll and pitch, see Skaloud 1995 for a theoretical 
explanation, but this does not seem to be the case for either pitch or 
roll. Both are at a level of about 0.03? (STD), and show a small drift 
in pitch and some rather systematic features in roll. This could be due 
to several reasons: unmodelled errors due to aircraft dynamics; time 
synchronization errors between GPS/INS and camera; large gyro 
noise due to aircraft vibration; residual errors in the 
photogrammetrically derived parameters of exterior orientation due 
to the strong correlation between position and attitude. Most likely, 
a mixture of all these sources contributed to the larger than expected 
attitude errors. Further analysis is planned to better explain some of 
the unexpected features. 
5. DIRECT GEOREFERENCING 
Target points in the imagery can be directly georeferenced, once all 
unknowns in the modified collinearity Equation 2 have been 
determined. In this case, the parameters of interior orientation as 
well as the offsets between on board sensors are known from 
calibration and the parameters of exterior orientation are resolved via 
GPS/INS integration. To evaluate the overall performance of direct 
georeferencing, coordinates of 50 control points were recomputed by 
means of Equation 2 and compared to their reference values. 
Practically, the computation was done by using the calibration 
parameters of interior orientation to correct the measured image 
coordinates and running the bundle adjustment with no ground 
control and fixed parameters of exterior orientation as derived from 
GPS/INS. The three dimensional position residuals on all 50 check 
points are depicted in Figure 7. The error distribution has a standard 
deviation of 30 em horizontally and 50 cm vertically. Additionally, 
the points are shifted towards South by a mean value of 35 cm. 
Since the camera position and orientation were considered as known 
parameters in the adjustment, errors in their determination are 
directly propagated into the derived ground coordinates. Considering 
the errors shown in Figures 5 and 6 at a flight height of 900 m, the 
resulting position errors on the ground could even be larger. This 
might indicate that the reference values derived by inverse 
photogrammetry are not as reliable as indicated by their standard 
deviations, due to the high correlations between them. 
  
  
    
GCP ERROR (m) 
  
  
1.5.9 19 17.21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 
POINT ID 
€ east ii north à height 
Figure 7: Check Point Residuals-Direct Georeferencing 
  
  
6. CONCLUSIONS 
The performance of an airborne data acquisition system for precise 
attitude and position determination in support of airborne remote 
sensing has been evaluated by means of aerotriangulation. Due to 
poor satellite geometry, the positioning errors along the aircraft 
trajectory were larger than usual, and reached several decimetres. 
The attitude errors from the integrated GPS/INS showed some 
unexpected features. While the azimuth error behaves randomly, as 
expected, with a standard deviation of 0.01 degree, the errors in pitch 
and roll are larger, about 0.03 degree, and seem to be systematic in 
nature. They need to be further investigated. Direct image 
georeferencing at 1:6000 using the measured GPS/INS attitude was 
better than 1 metre (absolute), when compared to 50 presurveyed 
control points. This accuracy is sufficient for many of the intended 
mapping applications. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
Flight time and expertise was provided by  Rheinbraun 
AG-Department of Photogrammetry, Cologne. This support is 
gratefully acknowledged. The authors wish to thank Mr. Werner 
Schneider for his effort in performing high quality photogrammetric 
measurements and Mr. Darren Cosandier for providing the bundle 
adjustment software. 
REFERENCES 
Ackermann, F. (1995) Sensor and Data Integration - The New 
Challenge, in Colomina/Navarro (eds.) Integrated Sensor 
Orientation, Wichmann, Heidelberg, Germany. 
Cosandier, D., T.A. Ivanco, M.A. Chapman and M. Dylke 
(1994) The Integration of a Digital Elevation Model in 
casi Image Geocorrection, Presented at the First 
International Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and 
Exhibition, Strasbourg, France, September 11-15. 
Friess, P. (1991) GPS-supported Aerial Triangulation - Empirical 
Results, in Linkwitz/Hangleiter (eds.) High Precision 
Navigation 91, Dümmler, Bonn, Germany. 
Hofmann, O. (1988) A Digital Three Line Stereo Scanner System, 
Archives of the Int. Society of Photgrammetry and 
Remote Sensing, Commission II, WGII/6, pp. 206-213. 
Hofmann, O., Kaltenecker, A., and Müller, F. (1993) Das 
flugzeuggestützte, digitale Dreizeilenaufnahme und 
Auswertesystem DPA - erste Erprobungsergebnisse, in 
Fritsch/Hobbie (eds. Photogrammetric Week 93, 
Wichmann, Karlsruhe, Germany. 
Schwarz, K.P., M.A. Chapman, M.E. Cannon and P. Gong 
(1993) An Integrated INS/GPS Approach to the 
Georeferencing of Remotely — Sensed Data, 
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 
59, No. 11, pp. 1667-1674. 
Schwarz, K.P. and M. Wei (1994) ENSU 623 Lecture Notes, 
Department of Geomatics Engineering, The University of 
Calgary. 
129 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B3. Vienna 1996
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.