Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B3)

  
the algorithm tries to locally detect areas where a large 
number of points can be matched. 
Basically, the accuracy and the reliability of the block 
adjustment depends on the block geometry, the number 
and distribution of the transferred tie points and their 
associated measurement precision (see details 
Ackermann, 1996b). Typical numbers for our approach 
are 100 - 200 or even more points per image. In order to 
keep the number of matched and transferred points at a 
certain level, the system automatically creates new tie 
point centers in the case of too few points being initially 
matched. Thus, the approach is focused in first instance 
on the feature-based matching technique. The simple 
key idea behind is to attain highly accurate results in the 
block adjustment by high redundancy. However, some 
circumstances like poor texture, for instance, might 
cause a drastical decrease of the number of matched 
points. In such cases the least squares matching method 
appears as a remedy to obtain a maximum measuring 
precision. 
The matched points do not have the same meaning as 
the points which are usually measured by an operator. 
The automatically measured point is located, for 
instance, on house corners or in the neighborhood of 
natural features (Figure 6 and 7). As long as the result of 
the automatic aerial triangulation is used within a digital 
system, the adjusted points are not of interest any more. 
However, they are important if the digital aerial 
triangulation is to be used with analytical plotters. 
3. Controlled tests 
3.1 Initialization 
The initialization of the MATCH-AT system based on an 
integrated DEM generation was tested with a small block 
of 16 images arranged in 4 strips with 6096 side lap and 
6096 end lap. The photographs scanned with 30 pim pixel 
size had a photo scale of 1:11500. The block area of 
approximately 3.2 km by 3.2 km was slightly hilly with 
height differences of 150 m. 
In order to simulate a flight index map we derived the 
exposure centers from a given aerial triangulation and 
randomly varied them with a standard deviation of 100 
m. A first crude initialization of the tie point areas was 
then derived solely from the strip azimuths, the 
approximate exposure centers and an average terrain 
height. Thus, this "zero" initialization represents the 
coarsest alternative being possible in the concept of 
chapter 2.3. After this first initialization some of the tie 
point areas were significantly shifted against their 
homologous position by more than 1 cm (Figure 8). The 
reasons were mainly camera attitude angles of more 
than 4 degrees and in second instance slight height 
undulations. If one would apply the kernel system with 
those initial tie point areas, it could happen in some 
areas that only few or even no points would be matched. 
Thus, we applied the initialization of the MATCH-AT 
system starting at a pixel resolution of 960 um. The 
system applied the matching scheme of the kernel 
system in combination with a subsequent DEM 
generation at the pyramid levels of 960 um and 480 pm. 
After each DEM generation new tie point areas were 
409 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B3. Vienna 1996 
created using the updated image orientations and the 
terrain surface. At the 960 um pixel level the system 
iterated the algorithm twice to obtain a sufficient 
convergence of the tie point locations. Table 1 shows the 
results of the two pixel resolution levels. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Pixel size op (Block) ODEM 
960 um 230 um = 2.6 m 3.4m (1.3 00) 
480 um 113 um = 1.3m 1.7 m (1.3 ox) 
  
Table 1: Initialization with block adjustment and DEM 
generation 
The sigma naught of the block adjustment (7 c» (Block)), 
which represents the precision of the automatic point 
identification, was in both pyramid levels approximately 
0.24 pixel. Those values are equivalent to 230 um and 
113 um, resp. The system reported also a theoretical 
accuracy of the block DEM posts (=opem) of 3.4 m and 
1.7 m. Those values are - as expected - by the factor 1.3 
larger than the sigma naught of the block adjustment. 
After this initialization the new tie point areas covered 
excellently homologous image patches (Figure 9). The 
locations of those tie point areas were accurate enough 
for a successful image matching in the kernel system, 
whose result of the block adjustment is not reported 
here. Although those preliminary results of the 
initialization part of MATCH-AT refer to a block with a 
side lap of 60 96, the method seems to be suited to cope 
with standard side laps of 2096 or 30 96, even if the photo 
scale is quite large and height undulations cause relief 
displacements. The critical case is given if only a coarse 
flight index map is provided with large-scale 
photography. However, this is going to be more and 
more a minor issue because of the GPS technology. 
Altogether, these first results are very promising and 
future work will be focused on optimizing this integrated 
DEM approach towards an efficient and flexible 
initialization of the kernel system. 
3.2 Block adjustment results 
The MATCH-AT system was applied to two blocks 
comprising 43 and 21 images, resp. The overall goal of 
the controlled tests was in first instance to assess the 
accuracy potential of the automatic aerial triangulation 
under practical conditions, especially with respect to the 
number of block images to be processed. Also, the 
system performance in terms of computation time was 
another important item of interest. Interactive work was 
necessary in both test scenarios for an initial parameter 
setup, the interior orientation, and the manual 
measurement of control and check points. The imagery 
was scanned on a PS1 scanner with 15 pm pixel size 
and a standard JPEG image compression. 
3.2.1 Block “Vaihingen/Enz“ 
This block of photo scale 1:15000 was formed by 45 
images arranged in 5 forward strips (6 images) and 5 
side strips (3 images) with 60 % end lap and 60 % side 
lap. The block area was slightly hilly with height 
differences of about 140 m covering an area of 
approximately of 9.5 km by 4.5 km. Two of the forward 
strips were almost identical with two other forward 
strips. Thus, the block geometry was considerably strong 
    
ape 
Pr ENT 
  
  
    
    
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.