surface models for its reconstruction (Baltsavias et al,
1995).
A number of extensions to the approach are also conceivable:
e A combination of surface and CSG primitives should
be considered to provide a more powerful and flexible
modeling scheme.
e The approach is equally applicable to close-range pho-
togrammetric applications, e.g. for industrial and ar-
chitectural object reconstruction. The surface model
database can easily be extended, in particular, to ac-
commodate com posite surfaces in new domains.
Current research is focussed on implementing the surface ex-
traction methodology using CPS object modeling. The full
potential of CPS modeling is being explored, in particular,
towards definition of an exhaustive database of primitive sur-
faces. Investigations into the inclusion of additional contex-
tual information conveyed by the user are underway.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was partly completed under the AMOBE project at
ETH-Zürich, while the author was at SRI International, and
under the UrbanModeler project at UCT. The financial sup-
port from ETH, NFP and the URC under Entity 453308 is
gratefully acknowledged, as is that from all the "amoebe".
Both Manos Baltsavias and Heinz Rüther caused much an-
guish with helpful critique and suggestions on a near-final
draft which, however, vastly improved the outcome.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Baltsavias, E., Mason, S., Stallmann, D., 1995. Use of
DTMs/DSMs and Orthoimages to Support Building Extrac-
tion, In: Grün, A., Kübler, O., Agouris, P. (Eds.), Automatic
Extraction of Man-Made Objects from Aerial and Space Im-
ages, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 199-210.
Bignone, F., Henricsson, O., Fua, P., Stricker, M., 1996.
Automatic Extraction of Generic House Roofs from High Res-
olution Aerial Imagery, Submitted to
Braun, C., Kolbe, T., Lang, F., Schickler, W., Steinhage, V.,
Cremers, A., Forstner, W., Plimer, L., 1995. Models for Pho-
togrammetric Building Reconstruction, Visual Computing, to
appear.
Dreyfus, H.L., 1992. What Computers Still Can't Do: A
Critique of Artifical Reason, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 354
pages.
Forstner, W., 1993. A Future of Photogrammetric Research,
NGT Geodesia, 93-8: 372-383.
Fua, P., Hanson, A.J., 1991. An Optimization Framework for
Feature Extraction, Machine Vision Applications, 4:59-87.
Haala, N., Hahn, M., 1995. Data Fusion for the Detection
and Reconstruction of Buildings, In: Grün, A., Kiibler, O.,
Agouris, P. (Eds.), Automatic Extraction of Man-Made Ob-
Jects from Aerial and Space Images, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel,
211-220.
Henricsson, O., 1995. Inferring Homogeneous Regions from
Rich Image Attributes, In: Grün, A., Kübler, O., Agouris,
P. (Eds.), Automatic Extraction of Man-Made Objects from
Aerial and Space Images, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 13-22.
522
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B3. Vienna 1996
Herman, M., Kanade, T., 1986. The 3D Mosaic Scene Un-
derstanding System. In: Pentland, A. (Ed.), From Pixels to
Predicates, Ablex Publ. Co., Norwood, N.J., 322-358.
Hofmann, O., Kaltenecker, A., Müller, F., 1993. Das Flug-
zeuggestützte, digitale Dreizeilenaufnahme- und Auswertesys-
tem DPA - erste Erprobungsergebnisse, In: Photogrammetric
Week '93, Fritsch/Hobbie (Eds.), Wichmann Verlag, 97-108.
Krabill, W.G., 1989. GPS Application to Laser Profiling and
Laser Scanning for Digital Terrain Models, In: Proc. 42nd
Photogram metric Week, Stuttgart, 329-340.
Lang, F., Schickler, W., 1993. Semiautomatische 3D-
Gebudeerfassung aus digitalen Bildern, Zeitschrift fr Photo-
grammetrie und Fernerkundung, 5/93: 193-200.
Lin, C.L., Zheng, Q., Chellappa, R., Davis, L.S., Zhang, X.,
1994. Site Model Supported Monitoring of Aerial Images, In:
Proc. CVPR '94, Seattle, 694-699.
Mason, S., Streilein, A., 1996. Photogrammetric Reconstruc-
tion of Buildings for 3D City Models, submitted to SA J.
Surveying and Mapping.
McKeown, D.M., McGlone, J.C., 1994. Integration of Photo-
grammetric Cues into Cartographic Feature Extraction, Proc.
SPIE, 1944: 2-15.
Mohan, R., Nevatia, R., 1989. Using Perceptual Organization
to Extract 3-D Structures, /EEE Trans. on PAMI, 11(11):
1121-1139.
Nebiker, S., Carosio, A., 1995. Automatic Extraction and
Structuring of Objects from Scanned Topographical Maps -
An Alternative to the Extraction from Aerial and Space Im-
ages”, In: Grün, A., Kübler, O., Agouris, P. (Eds.), Automatic
Extraction of Man-Made Objects from Aerial and Space Im-
ages, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 287-296.
Sayed, A.N., Mikhail, E.M., 1990. Extraction and Photo-
grammetric Exploitatin of Features in Digital Images, Tech.
Report CE-PH-90-7, Purdue University.
Schickler, W., 1992. Feature Matching for Outer Orientation
of Single Images Using 3-D Wireframe Control Points, /ntern.
Arch. of Photog. & Remote Sens., B3(III): 591-598.
Suetens, P., Fua, P., Hanson, A.J., 1992. Computational
Strategies for Object Recognition, ACM Computing Surveys,
24(1): 5-61.
Weidner, U., Forstner, W., 1995. Towards Automatic Build-
ing Extraction from High Resolution Digital Elevation Models,
ISPRS J. Photog. & Remote Sens., 50(4): 38-49.
KEY |
ABST
Image
implie:
way of
it with
From :
suppre
As an
elimin
extrac
Image
. progre
slowly
concej
road, I
can be
for a f
Anoth
has to
Sensi
are th
of diff
et al.
differe
has be
image
paper
the us
semar
define
Ing
of ver
(i.e. be
differ
sugge
the pe
gener
mean
by co
Ko
made
relati
lar ob
as sul
fact tl
relati
has fq