(2.8)
-0
(2.9)
(2.10)
entation
1 matrix.
ice, the
ation for
(2.11)
(2.12)
!
x
J Q1
ior (IO)
1eters,
.7)) the
as pass
nmetric
larly be
ere are
circles
exterior
If the
overed,
equired
res and
do not
ever, a
RO. A
pass circle in 2-image overlap contributes 4 equations,
and in 3-image adds 9 equations.
Extended Relative Orientation (ERO). The coplanarity
condition of the base vector B, and two image vectors p PR
is given by:
Bp, xPp) =0 (2.14)
Alternatively, it is given by
x
[x y 1], 1,M,KMp1, |y| =0 (2.15)
Hr
in which
0 -B, B,
K=|B 0 -B, (2.16)
-B, B, ©
10 -x
Ing = 10 1 -y (2.17)
00 fi.
E-M,KM x is called the essential matrix and is used for
calibrated cameras when x,yyf are known, while
F-IM EM q i5 called the fundamental matrix and is
used for uncalibrated cameras. Since the rank of K is
2, |F|=0 (Barakat, 1994). Further, the 9 elements ofF
are recoverable to a scalar multiple, hence the
maximum number of independent parameters in F is 7.
Consequently, ERO of a stereopair can only recover 2
IO elements in addition to the classical 5 EO elements.
Partial Absolute Orientation For complete absolute
orientation (AO) of a relatively oriented stereomodel,
control linear features are needed. Each control
straight line contributes four independent equations to
the recovery of the 7 parameters of AO. Therefore, a
minimum of 2 non-coplanar such lines is required.
Frequently, no "control" lines may be available, and
instead geometric constraints which yield partial
absolute information exist. These may then be used to
recover additional rotational elements depending upon
the available constraints (horizontal or vertical lines,
etc.).
Block Adjustment. This is the general method which
when based on unified least squares and carries all the
parameters and constraints as a priori weighted
information, can be used to perform any of the
operations discussed separately above.
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B3. Vienna 1996
2.5 Experiments and Results
A large number of experiments, with both simulated
and real data, were conducted to test the developed
mathematical models and study the effectiveness of the
exploitation of linear features in photogrammetric
applications. The results are:
Case A - Simulated Data A pair of photographs with
strong convergent geometry were simulated such that
the set of perfect image coordinates were perturbed
with errors having 0,70, -0.01 mm. Two experiments
were conducted using the two photo block triangulation.
Experiment #S1 is a regular two photo block
adjustment, which recovers 12 exterior orientation
parameters, using 10 control lines and 10 pass lines.
Experiment #S2 attempts to recover both interior and
exterior, 18, orientation parameters of the two photos
using 10 control and 10 pass lines. Tables 1 and 2 list
the RMS for dX,dY,dZ computed at 5 points on each
pass line for experiments S1 and S2 respectively. For
each point; dX,dY,dZ are the differences between
X,Y,Z computed using the a priori known line
descriptors (q,B,,B,,8;) and X,Y,Z computed using
their estimated values after the block adjustment.
Case B - Real Data (Bangor Imagery): The data set
consists of two nearly vertical aerial photographs flown
over an urban area in Bangor, Maine, at a scale of
about 1:8660. Regular two photo block triangulation
(i.e. solving for 12 parameters) was performed using 6
control lines and 9 pass lines. Table 3 lists the
differences in the camera parameters between the
original and the recovered parameters while table 4 lists
the RMS for dX,dY,dZ computed at 5 points on each
pass line. The results show the applicability of using
lines in the two photo block to recover both the camera
and pass feature parameters.
3. INVARIANCE-BASED OBJECT
RECONSTRUCTION
3.1 Invariance Versus Photogrammetry
Image invariance theory is based on a premise which is
fundamentally different from photogrammetric theory.
Image invariance deals with invariant quantities under
perspective projection (transformation). The cross-ratio
is the classic invariant of the projective line. For four
points on a line, under projective transformation, the
ratio of ratios of distances is invariant. In most
photogrammetric activities, very careful modeling of the
sensor elements as well as imagery acquisition
parameters is central to the techniques used. By
contrast, image invariance is almost totally built on the