Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B3)

HIGH RESOLUTION SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION OF A LANDSCAPE FROM LARGE SCALE AERIAL 
IMAGERY BY FACETS STEREO VISION - AN EXTENDED TEST 
M. Schlüter and B. P. Wrobel 
Institute of Photogrammetry and Cartography 
University of Technology Darmstadt 
Petersenstr. 13, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany 
wrobel@ac3.phgr.verm.th-darmstadt.de 
ms@ac3.phgr.verm.th-darmstadt.de 
International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Commission Ill, Working Group 2 
XVIIIth ISPRS Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 1996 
KEY WORDS: Photogrammetry, Vision Sciences, Matching, Orthoimage, DEM/DTM, Geometric Surface Reconstruction, 
Stereoscopic Aerial Imagery, Facets Stereo Vision 
ABSTRACT 
We present results of high resolution surface reconstruction in object space by Facets Stereo Vision, using large scale aerial 
images. After some references to the basics of Facets Stereo Vision, we try to classify possible sources of difficulties for the 
surface reconstruction. Consequently, we choose appropriate examplary areas in object space with different topographical 
character. For these areas, the results of Facets Stereo Vision are given in form of orthoimages and unsmoothed contours. 
Further on, corresponding quality statements like residual images and images of standard deviations are presented as supplied 
by Facets Stereo Vision. 
Topics like the occurrence of image blunders, moving cars in object space during the exposure interval, changing illumination 
during the exposure interval, terrain noise and discontinuities in object space are covered. We discuss their treatment as well 
as the reached accuracy. 
The results seem to be promising for further scene understanding tasks. 
1 ABOUT FACETS STEREO VISION 
Facets Stereo Vision is a method for surface reconstruction 
in object space, cf. [6]. DTM-heights, orthoimage grey val- 
ues and radiometric parameters are directly introduced as un- 
known parameters, and are estimated simultaneously by least 
squares adjustment from two or more images containing one 
or more spectral bands. 
For the examples in this paper, the relationship between 
image space and object space is described by the perspec- 
tive camera model. Both, DTM-heights and orthoimage 
grey values, are represented as 21-D functions over regular 
grids (called facets), using bilinear interpolation between grid 
points. Regularization, as discussed in cf. [7], is required to 
overcome ill-posedness of the image inversion and to bridge 
areas, in which the gradients of the image grey value signal 
are low in relation to image noise. As least squares adjust- 
ment requires Taylor-linearization, approximate start values 
of the parameters are needed. Therefore, the whole recon- 
struction process is formulated as a multigrid procedure: Step 
by step, a finer resolved DTM is calculated for each level of 
the image pyramid of the input data. For details see [5]. A 
consistency check with respect to occlusions is useful to avoid 
the matching of pixels to hidden parts of the surface. 
Our aim is not only to reach a surface reconstruction fitting 
tightly to the real world surface, but also to gain correct 
quality statements for our results as well. 
2 WHICH RESULTS CAN BE EXPECTED? 
Contrary to an operator with an analytical plotter, who mea- 
sures single point positions and maybe using explicit knowl- 
edge for point selection, Facets Stereo Vision works area 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B3. Vienna 1996 
based, assuming e.g. that the real world's surface is a Lam- 
bert reflector and can be approximated by a continuous 2i-D 
function over regularly spaced grid points, etc. . Keeping this: 
in mind, it is clear that problems of the surface reconstruction 
have to expected at those areas, where the used mathematical 
model does not fit properly to the real world. 
For a brief discussion of error avoidance or detection and for 
considerations concerning further developments of postpro- 
cessing algorithms, it seems to be helpful to distinguish three 
classes of possible error sources, even if they cannot exactly 
be kept distinct from each other: 
First, let us have a look at disturbances, which only occur 
locally in a minority of the used images: E.g. image blun- 
ders, objects which move in object space during the exposure 
interval or local light spots by total reflection. We prove by 
two examples (cf. fig. 2, 3) that simply using more than two 
images simultaneously can avoid a lot of trouble. 
A second group of errors is caused by terrain noise: Surface 
elements, which would require a finer resolution of surface 
facets than used in the reconstruction process can not be 
approximated properly. Image resolution sets the bound to 
the resolution in object space. So this error cannot be cir- 
cumvented easily. But the quality criteria supplied by Facets 
Stereo Vision offer powerful possibilities for detection and 
further semantic analysis. 
The third class of errors is caused by a deficiency of the 25- 
D surface model: Vertical surface areas can just be approxi- 
mated by steep facets. A 3-D surface model should remedy 
this situation, cf. [4]. 
Last but not least it should be mentioned, that Facets Stereo 
Vision does not use any explicit knowledge to eliminate parts 
758 
    
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
   
    
   
   
   
   
   
    
    
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
  
   
   
   
   
   
  
   
  
   
   
  
    
   
  
leav 
stru: 
The 
lems 
ate 
cf. f 
with 
leng 
grou 
expc 
ginn 
expc 
is ab 
Figu 
tion 
The 
ZEIS 
The 
nois) 
radic 
The 
grap 
stee[ 
and 
In où 
grow 
we c 
with 
in ol 
disar 
mans 
be st 
in th 
pixel 
We s 
pyrai 
  
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.