njugate points
3)
Least squares
improve accu-
stigated using
MOMS-02) as
agery. The re-
jach, even for
ching fails. By
| and the step
be adapted to
r instance, re-
whereas space-
all number of
| Image Corre-
otogrammetrie
/.; Neukum G.
he Mars94/96
ne Studie zur
1 Rahmen der
ammetrie und
"ast Operator
oints, Corners
Intercommis-
Xogrammetric
Figure 6: MOMS stereo images with conjugate points (re-
gion growing at pyramid level 0)
Heipke C., Kornus W., Pfannenstein A. (1996): The Eval-
uation of MEOSS Airborne 3-Line Scanner Imagery -
Processing Chain and Results; Photogrammetric Engi-
neering & Remote Sensing, 62(3), 293-299.
Hofmann O., Navé P., Ebner H. (1982): DPS — A Digital
Photogrammetric System for Producing Digital Eleva-
tion Models (DEM) and Orthophotos by Means of Lin-
ear Array Scanner Imagery; International Archives of
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 24(3), 216-227.
Montenbruck O., Gill E., Ohlhof T. (1994): A
Combined Approach for Mars-94 Orbit Determina-
tion and Photogrammetric Bundle Adjustment; DLR-
Forschungsbericht 94-13, 95 p.
Moravec H.P. (1977): Towards Automatic Visual Obstacle
Avoidence; 5th International Joint Conference on Arti-
ficial Intelligence, 584.
Ohlhof T. (1996): Local, Regional and Global Point Deter-
mination Using 3-Line Imagery and Orbital Constraints;
Presented paper at the XVIII. ISPRS Congress Vienna,
July 9-19, Commission III.
Otto G.P., Chau T.K.W. (1989): “Region growing” Algo-
rithm for Matching of Terrain Images; Image and Vision
Computing 7(2), 83-94. :
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B3. Vienna 1996
Figure 7: VIKING stereo images from Mars with conjugate
points
Figure 8: Parts from the VIKING stereo images with con-
jugate points
