4.2 Coping with Layover
Since the polar orbit of Magellan was highly elliptical, the
probe was much closer to the planet when passing the
equator than over the poles. To obtain image-strips along
the meridians, the inclination of the radar-beam was
adjusted during image acquisition. So, the initial Cycle 1
had images taken at 45° off-nadir near the equator and
about 11° near the poles. The same applies to Cycle 2
images, taken in similar way from the opposite direction.
The stereo partners to the initial coverage were acquired
with Cycle 3 and had look-angles ranging between 25°
off-nadir at the equator to 7° off-nadir near the pole. This
resulted in stereo-intersection angles between 20° and 4°.
While these angles are fairly small and represent a
limitation to the accuracy at which a DEM can be
extracted from the SAR images, there is another issue
caused by the steep look-angles: layover. In
topographically accentuated terrain a very large portion of
the slopes may be laid over. As shown in Figure 3, such
layover areas do not lend themselves easily to the
reconstruction of surface slopes and elevations. Connors
(1994) has shown that it is in principle possible to employ
overlapping stereo coverage to determinate whether a
layover situation exists or not. There is an ambiguity
which of two possible slopes may cause a particular image
situation. The ambiguity can be resolved with the third
opposite coverage. Gelautz et al. (1996, in print) are
working on automating the process used by Connors
(1994) in a manual manner. This would lead first to an
identification of layover areas in all of Magellan's
coverage; and it would secondly use the layover to
improve the slope measurement of the terrain that is giving
raise to the laid-over images.
Figure 3: Example of laid-over terrain features in Magellan
images taken at 11? look-angle off-nadir.
Area covered is 15 km x 2 km.
494
4.3 A System for Reprocessing Stereo Data
The use of the Magellan Stereo Toolkit, the elevation and
slope errors caused by erroneous ephemerides and the
problems arising from laid-over features cause us to
suggest that extraction of a detailed topographic relief
from Magellan images should be based on a complete
processing chain. It should begin at the raw signal
histories received at the ground receiving stations on Earth
from the satellite. We describe a sequence of procedures to
accomplish an optimum extraction of topographic relief.
(a) The ephemerides need to be reprocessed in the manner
described by Chodas et al. (1992). A total of about
5,000 orbits are at issue. For each orbit a number of
tie-points needs to be identified between an image of a
particular orbit and images from other cycles. Perhaps
10 to 20 tie-points would be needed per orbit. The
improvement of the ephemerides can also take
advantage of the most recent gravity model of the
planet. Its quality was vastly improved when the orbit
was circularized just prior to the satellite dipped into
the atmosphere and perished. That accuracy may be
sufficient to obtain an ephemeris as accurate as that
which could be obtained with tie-points in a type of
photogrammetric block adjustment.
(b) Reprocessing raw signal histories can be based on the
improved ephemeris and produces full-resolution
image strips. These will not be corrected for
topographic relief obtained from altimetry.
(c) Stereo matching uses new images as each orbit of
Cycle 1 crosses over orbits of Cycle 3. Such stereo
matches should have errors in the range of open 0.6 to
2 pixels depending on the type of features and the
dissimilarity between the images (Leberl et al., 1993).
Various authors have argued that image matching
should be performed on the mosaics that are currently
being processed in the form of F-MAPs. Match points
in each image could then be converted to time,
Doppler frequency and range which could then be
attached to the improved ephemeris. This proposal
would skip step (b) until such time that the stereo-
derived topographic relief has become available. But
in that event one would not use the best and highest
resolution images for matching. Given current parallel
processing technologies one could argue that going
through all signal history records and creating a new
intermediate set of 5,000 full-resolution images is no
longer the monumental task it was during the Mission.
(d) Intersecting surface XYZ-values is based on the
Doppler frequency and range measurements of
homologue features in Cycles 1 and 3. This produces
surface locations in XYZ at an accuracy of the
ephemeris. In areas where no stereo observations can
be made one can employ the altimetry data that were
independently obtained from a vertical looking
antenna (Ford et al., 1994).
(e) Gridding converts the stereo-derived surface points at
irregularly spaced position into a regular grid. This is
based on interpolations; such points are regularly
spaced in latitude/longitude or in a map projection.
Elevations obtained in this way can also be resampled
to be attached to the individual image pixels.
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B4. Vienna 1996