cates 
ation 
the 
night 
vhere 
f B/H 
ation 
shows 
even 
DEM 
cenes 
nding 
jo use 
llites, 
ed in 
n the 
o GLI 
ethod 
more 
tay at 
UENP 
-Term 
nology 
). Pixel 
tion of 
Vol.10, 
ication 
nt No. 
11,C.E., 
cessing 
a. Proc. 
Jakota, 
rmious 
/ASPRS 
'ation / 
ta and 
a Users 
or Stero 
Annual 
3-182. 
e-Based 
ix Falls, 
Landsat 
  
  
arr 
Figure 1 Conceptual Figure of Stereoscopic Vison 
by NOAA and Landsat 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
BE ! t ; 1 3000 T 
77 65 53 39 2 )7 
2750 + X 
Elevation Angle (Degree) Y 
Sí Long Radius 2500 - ; 
—-:-- Short Radius 2250 i 
ds rr ueram Interval 2000 - : 
^g — 1750 + 
= ss 
3 ; 1500 - 
5 S 
= = 
:3 i: S 1250 + 
2 m = 1000 L 
750 + 
Lr z 500 | 
: 4250. |- 
0 | y 0 | 
0 200 400 600 800 1000 0 200 
I Hd T 
x 5 39 24 
M Elevation Angle (Degree) 
Neu iN. -—. 
0. 
piri 0.2 
= ams 0,5 
  
  
Pixel Location from the Nadir 
Figure 2 Sopt Size and Interval Changes from the Nadir 
Qr 
  
Figure 4 Conceptual Figure of Matching by MSS Pixel Size 
n. ard 
400 600 800 1000 
Pixel location from the Nadir 
Figure 3 Sensitibity of Elevation by Detected Parallax 
  
  
Figure 6 The Relation between Elevation and Two Vectors 
from the Spots on the Ground 
39 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B4. Vienna 1996