Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B4)

  
Table 5 Time required for revision work — Non-experienced 
Aerial photo image Area A | Area B | Area C | Area D 
with digital map overlay 
(no other pre-processing) 
with masks 
  
  
70 90 120 70 
  
60 80 120 60 
  
with masks and emboss 
filtering 40 70 90 45 
unit: minute 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Table 6 Time required for revision work — Experienced 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Aerial photo image Area A | Area B | Area C | Area D 
with digital map overlay 
(no other pre-processing) | 30 35 54 30 
with masks 
31 30 55 32 
with masks and emboss 
  
unit; minute 
The houses to be added in the revised map were checked by 
stereoscopic observation of aerial photos and the number of 
them in each test area is shown in Table 7. 
Table 7 Number of houses to be added 
Area A Area B Area C Area D 
144 73 258 141 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
To see the accuracy of each method, number of omissions and 
erroneous inputs are summarized in Table 8-11 for each 
operator. 
Table 8 Number of omissions — Non-experienced operator 
  
  
  
  
Aerial photo image Area A | Area B | AreaC | AreaD 
with digital map overlay 
(no other pre-processing) | 2 13 2 4 
with masks 
6 9 3 1 
with masks and emboss 
6 15 5 0 
filtering 
  
Table 9 Number of omissions — Experienced operator 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Aerial photo image Area A | Area B | Area C | Area D 
with digital map overlay 
(no other pre-processing) 0 5 0 0 
with masks 
1 15 0 0 
with masks and emboss 
filtering 0 9 1 0 
Table 10 Number of erroneous inputs — Non-experienced 
Aerial photo image Area A | Area B | Area C | Area D 
with digital map overlay 
(no other pre-processing) 1 4 6 1 
with masks 
0 8 1 2 
with masks and emboss 
filtering 1 11 7 2 
Table 11 Number of erroneous inputs — Experienced 
Aerial photo image Area À | Area B | Area C | Area D 
with digital map overlay 
(no other pre-processing) 1 2 4 1 
with masks 
0 4 2 1 
with masks and emboss 
filtering 1 17 9 2 
  
The effectiveness of masking is not clear from the result (Table 
5 and 6). Some speeding up was observed for a non- 
experienced operator but no effect was observed for an 
experienced operator. One of the problem of masking is that the 
number of omissions increased by the experienced operator in 
area B where many houses already existed. It was found that 
about 30 % of these omission was caused by being buried under 
expanded masks. Therefore the amount of expansion must be 
carefully chosen. 
Emboss filtering has considerable effect of speeding up for both 
non-experienced and experienced operators. But the number of 
erroneous inputs increased. It is therefore hard to justify simply 
adopting the emboss filtering. 
4.3 Discussion 
In this method, human operators digitize the line of houses 
looking at CRT screen. It was felt by the operator that reference 
photo images should have higher resolution than 0.5 m on the 
ground. Otherwise the outline to be digitized is unclear and 
emboss filtering also do not generate clearly visible outline. 
Emboss filter is effective for finding houses constructed newly 
on bare lands. But it is not much effective for finding houses in 
already developed area. Some other method should be 
developed for the case. 
The experiment was for detection of new construction only. To 
apply inverse of the above masking image can be used to detect 
disappearance of houses. 
5. CONCLUSION 
Several methods have been tested to detect changes from image 
processing of aerial photos. Some of them are promising in 
view of reducing human work load. It seems that height data 
obtained by automatic stereo matching give useful information 
on land use change. Study in this direction should be further 
pursued aiming at adaptation to practical mapping process. 
Image understanding of aerial photo is very difficult problem 
and it is impossible to get practical result only with this 
approach. Therefore it is important to combine every available 
data source in order to get practically useful result. This multi- 
data fusion approach, in particular effective utilization of 
existing digital cartographic data, should be the subject of the 
next phase. 
REFERENCES 
Geographical Survey Institute, 1996. Study on semi-automatic 
analysis of aerial photos for land use change detection (The rii 
year). Geographical Survey Institute, Tsukuba. (in Japanese) 
Geographical Survey Institute, 1995. Study on semi-automatic 
“analysis of aerial photos for land use change detection (The 1% 
year). Geographical Survey Institute, Tsukuba. (in Japanese) 
Oyama, Y., 1996. Semi-automatic digital photogrammetric 
'system on PC. In: International Archives of Photogrammetry 
552 
and Remote Sensing, Vienna, Austria, Vol.XXXI (to be 
published). 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B4. Vienna 1996 
  
KE 
Ab: 
pho 
COO! 
pho 
aerc 
acqi 
GIS 
its € 
top 
mea 
visu 
of tr 
that 
data 
So f 
whi 
phot 
P ho 
nece 
phot 
mod 
pape 
capa 
PHC 
inte,
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.