íi
V
x
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Figure 2: Each additional measurement further bounds the
elevation estimations
Refer to appendix 4 for the derivation of this equation.
Note that this is a very simple model for the propagation of
the measurements. It should be extended by using the current
DEM and the surface orientations.
Thus from each measurement other 'measurements' can be
derived for arbitrary positions.
3.2 Combination of the measurements
If for two measurements at the same position the probability
densities are given by zi and 2; the variances are given by
01 and 03) and the measurements are independent, then the
combination is given by (see e.g. [Papoulis, 1984]):
2 2
0921 + 0122
E i 7
Te 02-402 ()
and
2 _0103 (8)
? elt]
The propagation step delivers the derived measurements that
can be used for the combination.
Figure 3.2 shows the results for the same examples as were
shown for the simpler min-max approach earlier. The 20
boundary corresponds to the z.,,,, of fig.3.1 and the variance
of the measurements is 1m.
A disadvantage of the proposed method is that near a mea-
sured elevation of a feature point the gradient of the surface
is estimated badly. This is because close to a measurement
821
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Figure 3: Bounding of the elevations by using estimations
with a Normal distribution. Shown are the o and 20 bound-
aries
the propagated measurements are almost solely depending on
the original measurement. This can be improved if surface
orientation measurements are used as well.
3.3 Including surface orientation measurements
Including surface orientation measurements is straightfor-
ward. In eq.5 the expectation of z'(x) is not 0 now, but
the measured orientation. Like the point feature elevation
measurements the surface orientation measurements can be
propagated as well.
3.4 Extension to 3 dimensional DEM's
The extension to the third dimension is straight forward. For
each position (x, y) in the DEM, now the following properties
are kept:
e elevation estimation: z
e variance of elevation estimation: o?
e surface gradient: (2, 2%} 2 (27.25)
e variance of surface gradient: 0°, , 0°,
æ y
An example of a 3 dimensional DEM and its estimation is
shown in fig.3.4. The reconstruction of the DEM was done
using 1000 measurements of the elevation for arbitrary chosen
positions and with different accuracies.
Unfortunately the feature point tracking and surface orienta-
tion measurement systems were not available yet, hence only
results on simulated surfaces are shown. The complete sys-
tem will be evaluated using a landscape model with a movable
camera setup.
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B4. Vienna 1996