- =
Topologic relationships are recorded through data
structuring (therefore sometimes referred to as building
topology). This in fact goes hand in hand with reconstructing
the objects. To reconstruct a house, we need the ground
surface defined by a TIN and the outline of the roof (see
figure 2b). Projecting the roof yields the footprint which
must be incorporated in the TIN by local retriangulation (see
figure 2c). This way an integrated representation of terrain
relief and other topographic objects is assured; the
topologic relationships between ground surface and solid
man made objects is established and maintained in the FDS
database.
Figure 2 Steps of data structuring for 3D FDS.
Figure 2d indicates that the faces defining the walls are
oriented to serve 3D visualization which requires that the
normal vector of each visible face of a solid object should
point toward the outside of the body.
Figure 3 (a) Outline of two adjacent roofs, (b) details of the
roof, (c) two adjacent flat roofs with the same elevation, (d)
similar to (c) but different elevation, (e) replacing the outline
of the roofs by their facets after reconstructing the main
geometry.
Not all topologic relationships, however, which are shown
in figure 1 (eg, a node in a body), can be established at this
863
stage, because of the lack of information from
photogrammetric data collection. In some cases adjacency
can directly be inherited from 2D topology (see figure 3a
and 3c), but in others (see figure 3d) manual intervention
becomes necessary. This matter still needs further
investigation.
Dealing with occlusions is a bigger problem in 3D than 2D
topographic mapping. The chances of attaining a tolerable
algorithmic completion of invisible edges are much less. A
remedy can be sought in acquiring photography for 3D
mapping with larger than conventional overlaps, and
providing better facilities for multi-image access. In a photo
flight with generous overlap it is more likely that a point
hidden in one stereomodel is visible in other images. On a
DP, either local image matching with a 'third party' could be
attempted, or quickly swapping stereomodels to one where
the once hidden point can be observed. Despite of
procedural refinements of aerial photogrammetry, complete
geometric reconstruction of the urban scene will generally
not be possible. Since position will usually be defined in a
national coordinate system, all field completion work can
unambiguously be linked to the data collected
photogrammetrically.
A DXF interface between the FDS database and the
photogrammetric subsystem for superimposition and
editing is also convenient for linking up to commercial
rendering software such as 3D-Studio or virtual reality
software accepting VRML files such as the 3D viewer WIRL
on Internet.
3.2.2 Semantics and Texture
Digitizing features in a stereomodel is not done without
interpretation. The semantic information extracted by
interpretation can easily be encoded by extending the
codes used for object reconstruction. In model construction
the codes must be translated to class labels and thematic
attributes for the FDS database.
A bigger problem is extracting photo textures, geometrically
and radiometrically rectifying the image segments and
storing them in the FDS database. Once the roofs, walls,
football fields, etc are geometrically determined, the image
coordinates of the boundary polygons are readily available
on any photogrammetric plotter. On a DP it is then
conceptually not difficult to 'cut out' the corresponding
image segment and geometrically rectify it to the face.
Before archiving such image segments, it is desirable to
retouch those images that have alien texture (eg, tree on a
facade). The problem of occlusions is even more aggravating
for image mapping than it is for extracting vector data.
Automatic retouching is not that trivial, but manual image
manipulation is offered by commercial programmes like
PHOTOSHOP, PHOTOSTYLER, etc. Another desired
processing step is radiometric homogenization in order to
reduce effects of different lighting conditions (see Gruber et
al, 1995).
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B4. Vienna 1996