tical slicing
id software
3TZ at the
NNING
iser spot is
des with the
nt detector
[6, 7]. The
onfocal spot
rate a stack
is technique
y a factor of
light micro-
ength which
resolution
by rejecting
us allowing
thick speci-
| of a Leica
[he resulting
planar slices
f ~170nm at
onding slice
onal strength
TWARE:
yrecise depth
n enhanced
able with
9 be able to
'e dependant of
6
analyze and visualize the resulting stacks of
slice images the concept of a dedicated volume
processing software with a strong emphasis on
the demands of CLSM has been defined.
QUASIA3D (QUantitative — Analytical
System for Image Acquisition in 3D) addresses
in particular two problems which are inherent to
volumes generated by CLSM:
-a high number of detected objects per
volume which when visualized give rise to
a large number of polygons (-5*10° and
more) each with a small number of pixels
(<30).
- numerous parameters influence the imaging
process in CLSM and lead to distortions of
the volume. information. The most
important problems are:
. complex light absorption processes for
excitation and emission
. local sensitivity due to position
dependant relative aperture
» possible bleaching effects of
photosensitizers
. light scattering
» low SNR due to the extremely fine
focus volume
5. QUANTIFICATION SCHEME IN 3D
The main specification of QUASIA-3D for
the quantitative approach is to deduce
fluorophore content from the recorded
brightness of a confocal image stack. The
quantification process relays on the fluorometry
equation:
J floresence = Jicadiaion P nücropkor M icrophore
with
j : Emitted (observed) flux density
floresence
: Illumination spatial light flux
density total
J irradiation
with
Bootie Photosensitizer dye concentration
: Photoefficiency of the dye for the
M oropliors = p.
specific irradiation wavelength
If we consider for a moment a fibre fluorometer
which records the total flux from an object in
space we find:
3
— Q 2
flux woud > 4 Tt NN) iin Y] oom | p sid
Volume
7-4 TT N, "7 irradiation : yarns E VA ner ire
with Qthe space angle covered by the
fluorometer, m,the gathering efficiency of the
fibre tip and m the mass of all the fluorophores.
The situation for a microscope is similar. With
the numerical aperture NA = tan(a)
Q= f 2m sin} dx -2 (1-cos(a)
1
2
1+NA
—-2Tt|1—
the total recording efficiency is
N oil n lens nu M ia
4 4
solvent cover
n=o
4
Sensor (n +n f (n +n f n +n f
oil lens oil cover solvent cover
with othe sensitivity of the microscope's
registration sensor, n. the refraction indices of
the various media (immersion oil, lens, cover
glass).
Based on a known San the reconstruction
for an ideal microscope would be trivial. Due to
several distortions the CLSM observations are
far from ideal for quantification purposes [8].
The list shows various influences ordered in
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B5. Vienna 1996