he use of semi-
ew technology
lotogrammetric
of photogram-
| Architectural
immetric resti-
cooperate and
:eded for local
st was to draw
ts reached are
chitecture may
from amateur
ameras.
follows: Each
al region. As
| Architectural
e partners. As
ter, the region
. This way the
help speed up
g of monume-
netrists could
ated projects,
tto Wagner's
tz in Vienna,
appears in an
1 of the 150th
A 6-station surveying network has been established
around the building and the polar coordinates of 44
(partly natural but well defined points, see examples of
sketches, partly targetted by black stickers, 2cm diameter,
cirular) control points have been measured. After the
adjustment of the surveying measurements, the local
cartesian coordinates of the control points have been
determined with an rms values of 2mm. These points
cover all four exterior facades.
2,690 5,238
Facade 2 (unscaled)
28017
A | m
rs X
Figure 2. Sample figure of the control points used in the test.
Subsequently the object was photographically covered.
During this campaign the following cameras have been
used:
* Rollei 6006
* Hasselbland 500 EL/M
* Leica Elcovision
* Nikon FE2
* Pentax PAMS 645P
* Pentax ME-Super
* Canon AE1
* Contax RTS III
* JVC-S77 camcorder
totaling to more than 100 photographs. The scale of the
images range from 1:200 to 1:400 for the medium format
cameras and from 1:500 to 1:800 for the small format
cameras.
102
E MEI
i
Do
p
zZ
10510 ~. —
[og ns
wg
106 9-7
[706] — [1m]
t
d N
107
[107 ] ! Nm
5 of]
Figure 3. Sample figure of the photo configuration.
The photographs have been measured by different
measuring devices (analytical plotters, small analytical
Systems, digitizers, automatic measurements on digital
images) and the data processed by different software
packages.
3. THE PARTICIPANTS
A network of 26 University Institutes of Photogrammetry
in 16 mainly European countries has been formed. 12
Universities have been working together on a project
known as “Engineering Photogrammetry of CEI (Central
European Initiative)” since 1991. The remaining 14
Universities joined the group in 1992, at the request of
CIPA. From those participants 16 Institutes have
completed their contribution to the test, according to the
following table.
Three Pilot Centers have undertaken the job for
administration of the test. More specifically, TUV
(Vienna, Austria) is administrating the whole project,
took the most of the photography and perfomed the
surveying of the monument. AUT (Thessaloniki, Greece)
undertook the analysis of the numerical results, and the
statistics of compatibility of the different solutions. GRA
(Granada, Spain) performed the analysis of the graphical
presentations from the photogrammetric restitution.
The participants were free to select the method and the
instruments as available.
4. DATA PROCESSING
The participants work resulted in a total of 107 different
solutions, using either semi- or non-metric camera,
medium or small format, measuring devices of different
accuracies, and minimum or maximum control.
In order for all these solutions to be able to compare to
each other the following strategy has been followed:
4.1 Transformation to a common frame
The minimum constrained solutions obtained so far have
been transfered to the same reference frame which
provides the minimum norm and it is defined by the free-
network adjustment. The transformation of the minimum
constrained solution to a free-network solution requires
an S-(Helmert) transformation. The points kept fixed
(base points) during this transformation are the same for
all participants. The coordinates and the respective
covariance matrix are then transferred to their free-
network respectives.
4.2 Accuracy assessment
In order to access the accuracy of the adjusted
coordinates we computed a number of criteria, ranging
from local criteria to global criteria. It should be pointed
out that all these are accuracy criteria since they refer to
the actually known (from surveying measurements) object
coordinates of the withheld from the adjustment check
points.
465
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B5. Vienna 1996