Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B5)

ample 
ction in an engineer- 
on method described 
norm data snooping 
nge photogrammetric 
in Figure 8. 
etry Example. Photo 
rity. 
  
cluded four exposure 
d seven unknown ob- 
rk redundancy of 35. 
ocus of this example, 
rbed by 50m (noted 
ations were randomly 
of this limited exam- 
lay be correctly iden- 
jon whereas repeated 
ify multiple blunders 
of observations with 
int which is observed 
. It appears that the 
ih the intentional er- 
In addition to the 
l, a compelling rea- 
ease with which large 
a visual examination 
10. 
,» norm residuals 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
L1 La 
p-value | p-value : 
0.00005 | 0.01097 
0.32227 | 0.00470 
0.06923 | 0.00001 
0.05638 | 0.01420 
0.01854 | 0.00001 
0.19880 | 0.25638 
0.30007 | 0.22081 
0.00001 | 0.00001 
e initial network un- 
stations which were 
utions containing un- 
Adding a fourth ex- 
] thereby increasing 
a 1996 
Figure 9: Lj Norm Residual Plot: Data Contains Two 
50um Blunders 
40 T T T T T T T 
  
30 3 
10 © 0° 
o 
Q9 9 oo e o o 
0-0 ¢, 00 0x0 - 0000 “ao 0 © 0 0.9 0000 qo0o oc0oo oooco ood" oo C0 - 
5.0 o co 9. 9 
-10Fr- -— e o. 9 cis CY 4 
Residual Magnitude (um) 
o 
  
  
  
1 1 L 
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 
Observation Number 
Figure 10: L5 Norm Résidual Plot: Data Contains Two 
50um Blunders 
20 T T T T T T T 
  
-5r ; Qi on 
Residual Magnitude (um) 
© 
T 
© 
  
  
1 L 1 
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 
Observation Number 
  
network redundancy) eliminated the “spike-only” residual 
sampling distributions. 
8 Conclusions 
Based on these preliminary investigations and numerical 
examples, it appears that analysis of L; residuals can be 
put on a sound statistical footing by Monte Carlo gener- 
ation of sampling distributions. This together with the 
robust character of Li estimation makes it worthy of con- 
sideration for analysis of photogrammetric and geodetic 
networks. As pointed out, however, there are some po- 
tential pitfalls to avoid in network design when network 
redundancy is minimal. 
References 
[1] Baarda, W., 1968. A Testing Procedure For Use In 
Geodetic Networks, Neth. Geod. Comm., Publ. on 
Geod., New Series 2, No. 5 Delft. 
43 
Bassett, G., 1973. Some properties of the Least Ab- 
solute Error Estimator. PhD. Dissertation, University 
of Michigan. 
Kavouras, M., 1982. On the Detection of Outliers 
and the Determination of Reliability in Geodetic Net- 
works. Technical Report No. 87, University of New 
Brunswick, Canada. 
Mackenzie, A., 1985. Design and Assessment of Hor- 
izontal Survey Networks. Master of Science Thesis, 
University of Calgary. 
Marshall, J. and Bethel, J., (in press 1996). Basic 
Concepts of L1 Norm Minimization for Surveying Ap- 
plications. Journal of Surveying Engineering. 
Menke, W., 1989. Geophysical Data Analysis: Dis- 
crete inverse theory, Academic Press, Inc. San Diego, 
CA. 
Mikhail, E., 1976. Observations and Least Squares, 
IEP, New York. 
Pope, A., 1976. The Statistics of Residuals and The 
Detection of Outliers, NOAA Technical Report NOS 
65 NGS 1, Rockville, Md. 
Press, W., et. al 1992. Numerical Recipes in C, the 
Art of Scientific Computing, Second Edition, Cam- 
bridge University Press. 
Zarembka, P. ed., 1974. Frontiers in econometrics. 
Academic Press, New York, N.Y. 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B5. Vienna 1996 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.