Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B7)

y be 
ation 
sed. 
folds 
ous: 
nes, 
also 
mes, 
are 
are 
es; 
hear 
their 
and 
hear 
the 
arge 
IMS; 
Sn+2) 
osite 
and 
ures 
and 
m in 
tails. 
hear 
Sc+2 
rete, 
The 
sses 
Sn 
exes 
ative 
ized 
ated 
how 
were 
904) 
rom 
ellite 
st in 
arth. 
IS to 
that 
nese 
> or 
nust 
the 
986) 
also reviewed the application of lineament name in 
describing linear features, without any genetic 
implication. Sabins (1986) also discussed several 
geomorphic and/or tonal features that may give rise to 
a lineament. 
3.2. Typology of lineaments 
A look-over at many papers dealing with lineaments 
showed that lineament extraction is just done in a 
quantitative sense. This was the point used by Wise 
(1982) to criticize the methods of lineament extraction 
summarized in his 32 rules. According to Wise (1982), 
"it is not the quality of the lines which counts, but rather 
their number and their potential for compilation into 
artistically pleasing patterns". 
Amaro & Strieder (1994) emphasized that any 
lineament in images have topographic relief and/or 
associated tonal features which are due to the 
underground 3D structure in the Earth’s crust. Then, 
most of them may be considered topographic high 
(positive lineaments), or topographic lows (negative 
lineaments), when seen in the lightening direction of the 
image. The patterns and the nature of the lineaments 
are different according the association of positive, 
negative or tonal lineaments. Based in this kind of 
differences, Amaro & Strieder (1994) proposed to 
distinguish between two types of lineaments: type 1 and 
type 2. 
3.2.1. Characterization of type 1 lineaments 
The type 1 lineaments are associated to regionally 
penetrative structures. Such structures develop parallel 
positive and negative geomorphologic features, 
distributed in linear or curvilinear patterns. Type 1 
lineaments can be considered composite lineaments, 
because they are also characterized by a tonal banding 
related to the lithological component. For the analysis 
of this kind of lineament, it is important to evaluate 
parameters such as: density, geometric disposition, 
azimuthal trend and length. The penetrative ductile 
structures present the best geomorphological 
expression of this kind of lineament; however, these 
lineaments can also characterize sedimentary and/or 
volcanic layers slightly folded. They represent the 
differential erosion of penetrative structural features 
associated to lithology. These lineaments can model 
structural forms, like folds and shear zones. 
3.2.2. Characterization of type 2 lineaments 
The type 2 lineaments are associated to brittle 
disjunctive structures. They are mainly topographic 
lows (negative lineaments), which cut across 
lithological boundaries; this is the case for brittle faults 
and fracture zones. However, this type of lineaments 
can also develop associated positive and negative 
features, sometimes with tonal banding, when regarded 
to brittle-ductile fault zones. Type 2 lineaments are 
often rectilinear to slightly curvilinear features and 
control drainage pattern. Type 2 lineaments may be 
analysed through their spatial distribution pattern, 
azimuthal trend and length. 
175 
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
The discrimination of both types of lineaments were 
performed in the Porto Nacional (TO) region, through 
monoscopic analysis of LANDSAT TM-5 paper images 
(color composition 3-4-5). The images are WRS 
222/067 and 222/068, obtained at 24/JUL/1991 (EL 41 
and 40, AZ 052 and 051, respectively). According to 
Moore & Waltz (1983), good lightening elevation to 
lineaments analysis is from 35° to 45°. July is the driest 
month in the region, what is also good for lineament 
extraction. 
4.1. Type 1 lineaments analysis 
4.1.1 General characteristics: morphology and 
geometry 
The type 1 lineaments in the Porto Nacional region are 
characterized by rectilinear to curvilinear segments, are 
fine spaced and have mean length around 1100 m 
(figure 1). They are associated to positive and negative 
lineaments parallel to a tonal banding. 
Type 1 lineaments occur by three different manner in 
the SW portion of the area: a) they are part of a 
regional pattern of rectilinear and curvilinear segments 
disposed in an open regional fold (position 1, fig. 1); 2) 
they define a rectilinear to slightly curvilinear zone with 
thickness as much as 3700 m (position 2), which 
obliterate the lineaments of the position 1; c) they 
define a circular to elliptical pattern centered in 
position 3, which is rimmed by the lineaments of 
position 2. This circular to elliptical structure were also 
recognized in position 4, where it is rimmed by 
rectilinear zones of positions 8 and S. 
The regional folded pattern of position 1 is also 
observed in the central-east portion of the mapped area 
(position 5). The type 1 lineaments of position 2 extend 
NNE to NE toward the central and NE part of the 
mapped area, where they define zones of variable 
thicknesses (positions 6, 7, 8, 9 e 10). 
In the NW part of the area, the type 1 lineaments are 
concentrated in another thick zone (4600 m thick) and 
are longer than in other similar position (position 11); 
this zone extend for than 45 km toward NNE. 
In the central part of the area, there are many places 
where type 1 lineaments could not be precisely defined, 
since this part correspond to the most eroded one. 
4.1.2. Discussion and interpretation 
The interpretation of the nature of different type 1 
lineaments recognized in the Porto Nacional region was 
proceeded through field works dealing with structural 
geology. 
Type 1 lineament pattern in the positions 1 and 5 
characterizes regional Fn+2 folds developed upon NMS 
rocks. Then, the lineaments themselves are the 
geomorphic results of erosion upon S,//Sh+1 foliations. 
The regional Fn+2 folds are obliterated by shear zones in 
the positions 6, 8, 9 and 10; then, the lineament in 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.