Normalised c
Normalised c
(a)
m D >» NN
AX 2077 MSS
- 4 7 QOS
RRS em
L0 I SN
4 DA, JI, 77 2 A
EI 77
TE
EN
ZZ DUUM)
ZZ SBA
m,
(7 0225
iv
N
Wi dE 7723
/7 7778
jJ HU
NEA "n >
| RN () il 7 77 2% LR
N Un 7 (X
N | 2v
7 ()
//
NS WW 7 1
SS x v dU
(b)
ZR Es
o A NN
JH NN N
jj
Normalised o
Normalised c
i 2272 > (b) ve (c)
N as Gi
NN ni an J 2
UNT i rir
Co SAT
\ ww 7/717 ii
S NY SO
© i NS 7 0
Jj)
WW N ZZ
SS No 2 ll Qi
NS SO
Normalised c
Normalised c
e 3 o
s SIS S:
«5572 206095 =>
SRE 300562 ee. SSL
= SS
7 s
uS
eii ioo 3
= ZZ 2$ SS
ZN goes
2. SS =
Figure 5: polarisation signature (top: co-polarisation and bottom: cross-polarisation) comparison using the
measured and simulated Mueller matrices for unploughed farmland covered with short grass in Gippsland at
P-band: (a) measured, (b) simulated and (c) absolute difference.
Normalised o
Normalised c
Figure 6: polarisation signature (top:
ZN
is AN N
Sr MM
ë ZZ ZA = Es
= = > JE
P
oat TORY
LN >
mé Nz
* SO) NK >>
NU QU NS
SA
N AN
(b)
ERN
A >
SN 7
453 5s ZN
SZ N
A
AN
y 5) A
SN
Normalised o
Normalised c
AP trs
x NOR N ZN Qs
UD X e TN Un >
Normalised c
Normalised c
NO
GE
co-polarisation and bottom: cross-polarisation) comparison using the
measured and simulated Mueller matrices for residential areas in Sydney at P-band: (a) measured, (b) simu-
lated and (c) absolute difference.
202
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996