us,
31th
22-1
Net
rity
| up
the
1sed
The
nap -
DY O-
ions
DVI -
VHRR
tion
were
vel-
for
ated
nate
APAR
PAR)
IPAR
nbus
com-
ning
over
sing
was
ver-
ions
ally
rage
and
have
hese
with
food
ious
e on
and
ies,
ties
pro:
obal
ucts
two
duc:
fore
Sti
for
pec"
sion
are
tain
gion
> On
local characteristics.
(p. To evaluate net primary
productivity (NPP) to provide
spatial information that can be
used for land use planning
usingc more recently developed
and sophisticated oProduction
Efficiency Model (PEM).
PEM: |whichscan^adsorwuse remote-
ly sensed data as inputs, has
been successfully used for
estimation of global NPP
(Prince: ando Goward: 1995),::but
no separate estimates for
agricultural productivity has
yet been attempted\on auregion-
al and global'*scale. Thersfore,
agricultural productivity
estimation was takens up for
india, ones of 'the»agricultural-
ly dominant country, using PEM.
2. Theory
Productivity is the rate of
atmospheric carbon uptake by
vegetation through the process
of: photosynthesis. Built up: of
productivity is a complex
phenomenon which is a
culmination of many temporal
plant processes. Recent methods
to evaluate NPP involves
decomposition of productivity
into independent parameters
such as Incoming solar
radiation, radiation ‘absorption
efficiency and conversion
efficiency of absorbed
radiation into. organici; matter
(Kumar and Monteith, 1981). The
models developed in these
studies are an advancement over
the statistical models properly
accounting. for various steps -in
the productivity built up
process.
Goward et.al.(1985) showed that
vegetation indices, such as
Normalized Difference Vegeta-
thon Index 5 (NDVI;) are related
to net primary production (NPP,
g m year ) Monteith x (1977)
Suggested that + NPP: under non:
Stressed conditions is linearly
related to the amount of photo-
synthetically active ckpadiat ion
(PAR, MJ mi"). uthat:is absorbed
by green foliage (APAR, MJ m
- Further, Kumar. and. Monteith
(1981) showed how the fraction
Of PAR absorbed (fAPAR) relates
to the ratio of red reflectance
(RJ to near infrared (NIR)..
Asrar et.al. (1984) subsequent -
iy reiated o the - NDVI -tó- the
fAPAR; hence NDVI may be used
to estimate NPP at global scale
by the relationship:
NPP-ceX(APAR)-eXZ (NDVI*IPAR)
where E(APAR) is the annual sum
of APAR, € is the PAR
conversion: efficiency Ag MJ.)
299
and /IPAR£Mis. the/rincident PAR.
This iis the simplest formo of
the Production Efficiency Model
(PEM).
Eck and Dye (1991)mdescribed-.a
simple, physically based,
satellite remote sensing method
for; estimating -1PAR that: uses
ultraviolet (UV) reflectivity
data from the Nimbus Total
Ozone Mapping Spectrometer
(TOMS) . Subsequently, Dye
(1995) generated a time series
global monthly IPAR »datairset
using the same technigue, which
Lis quite. -useful/sfor. :regionali
and global productivity studies
(Prince and Goward, 1995). Dye
andi Goward. (1993) also. created
a global APAR image using
Spectral reflectance measure -
ments from the NOAA-7 AVHRR and
TOMS data.
One.ofcthe major problemi in the
NPPirestimations is: I the finding
Of representative values ‘of €
for various vegetation types as
ith -changes:o withswthe »stype | of
vegetation, temperature, water
availability and metabolic type
ofi the: planc iC or; € type).
Princesd9945'"and^Ruimy *et..2$al.
(1994) Searched through the
literature and listed € values
for various vegetation and
ecosystem types. Hunt (1994)
Suggested that global estimates
of NPP based on vegetation
indices should include a clas-
sification among established
forest, young: forest rand non-
forest ecosystems to account
for differences in e.
3. DATA
3.1 Satellite data
3.1.1 NDVI data: NASA/NOAA
Pathfinder AVHRR Land (PAL) 10
day composited -NDVI data set
for =the year 21987, 1988, - ‘ana
1989 was procured from the
Goddard Distributed Active
Archive Center (DAACh, USA. :To
generate » composited data: set,
107 consecutive days of data are
combined, taking the observa-
tion- for each 8:km bin from the
data with the fewest: clouds and
atmospheric contaminants as
identified by the highest NDVI
value. There: are three; compo-
sites: persmonthh foro each: year
of datash Thet compositing tech-
nique faeirdliy- removes the cloud
contamination from the data to
use in climatic modeling stud-
ies: (Agbw and James, 31994). The
data” is ‘available on. Goode*'s
Equal Area Projection.
data: Global IPAR
generated by Dye
using UV reflectivity
351.2 IPAR
data set
(1995)
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996