Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B7)

  
Table 1. 
Estimates of agricultural NPP and biomass for India. 
  
  
  
  
  
Months NPP (Q ha ^) Biomass (Million tons) 
1987 1988 1989 1987 1988 1989 
l 3.67 4.82 Td 27.55 36.14 53.36 
2 6.90 6.10 8.98 51:73 45.75 67.33 
3 6.56 6 v57 8.87 49.18 49.58 66.49 
4 3.47 2.14 6.03 20.02 16.15 45.21 
5 3.94 4.31 3533 29.58 32.54 24.94 
6 4.52 3.55 3.57 33.93 26:79 26.79 
7 3.32 2.62 4.67 24.89 19:77 35.00 
8 6.52 7492 7:59 48.90 59.83 56.94 
9 8419 10.05 11:63 61.45 76.88 87.23 
10 7.67 8.42 11.91 57.56 63.58 88.57 
1d 4.89 6:28 6 229 36.67 47.40 47.15 
12 3.69 5.28 4.55 27,67 39.86 34. 15 
Annual 58.68 65.75 83.15 470.13 514.27 633.16 
during. these months. Thus the figures are as per the 
PEM seems to describe correctly agricultural i yeaxnd. eq sistaridng 
the annual variations: int agris from -summer: crops: in! June/July 
cultural biomass generation. and ending with’ the harvesting 
of» winter «Crops: in April in “the 
Agricultural NPP of _p8-68, next calender ye ax, However, 
82 Ab and 83.312 Q ha and the general trends of agricul- 
biomass i of 450.4135 54.27 and tural production compares 
633.16 million tons was fairlyo well with the reported 
estimated" Êor.-the -yvearss i1987, figures. 
1988 and 1989; respectively. 
This biomass Was translated 6. CONCLUSIONS 
into 136.31, £1347 56: :d4ndv 184.46 
million tons of agricultural Based upon the present study sit 
production for the above three could. be concluded that the 
years. NDVI-Climatological modeling 
technique developed provided an 
The performance «of. monsoon is automated and quick way to map 
thes critical factor Ans: Indian 
agriculture-as.it is the single 
most. important factor effecting 
agricultural 
study in the behavior of Indian 
monsoon showed that it was 
normal: hfor:-thedvyvéar51i1989:> But 
ito showed a negative . anomaly 
during 1987 and a positive 
anomaly during 1988 causing 
drought and :floods….ain the. two 
years, respectively. Therefore, 
the Crop growth and 
agricultural productivity was 
drasticallys;reduced in^ both the 
years. This interannual; anomaly 
in agricultural productivity 
could also be described through 
the «present methodology: using 
PEM: The highest agriculturai 
production of 1931.16 mildion 
tons was estimated for the year 
1289 as compared to 036.31: and 
147.56 million tons for the 
years 1987 and 1988, 
respectively. 
We made” an effort to compare 
the estimated agricultural 
production figures with the 
reported figures from Bureau: of 
Economics: and: Statisticss (BES)-. 
But ^ weuwfindo it difficult uo 
compare the figures because the 
estimated values are an 
integration over the calender 
year whereas the BES reported 
302 
productivity. A 
irrigated agricultural ‘areas: iin 
India. It was possible to make 
fairly correct estimates of 
agricultural production for 
India using the PEM. The model 
was; also ‘able. to describe. the 
annual and interannual 
variations in agricultural 
India: Therefore, 
the technique developed in the 
present study. seems^ to have is 
great potential for estimating 
agricultural production more 
accurately. 
production of 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
The senior author is: thankful 
to the Japanese Government for 
the award of Monbusho: Scholar: 
ship for carrying out this 
research: The authors rare also 
thankful to the NOAA/NASA AVHRR 
Pathfinder Project ‘for making 
available time series NOAA 
data. 
REFERENCES 
Agbu, PLA. and James, M.E. 
1994. The NOAA/NASA 
Pathfinder. AVHRR.- Land data 
set User's Manual. Goddard 
Distributed Active Archive 
Center, NASA, Goddard: Space 
Flight Center (GSFC). 
Greenbelt. USA. 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.