ize as well 
al anomaly 
ly assume 
d iron con- 
n the other 
ty anomaly 
rface (figs. 
' a deeper- 
y other ef- 
T & WEST, 
Y applied to 
ory results 
icter of the 
further ob- 
rawback of 
that pixels 
count con: 
ated image 
ist to make 
nprove the 
se in which 
> to a com 
anted here, 
3/5) of five 
i UTM grid 
matic layer 
  
Fig. 3: Color ratio (3/1, 5/7, 3/5 in R, G, B) image of Jibâl Fig. 4: Same area as in fig. 3. Shown is a GIS classifica- 
Mugrar (upper middle of picture) showing a strong iron tion of gravity and aeromagnetic residuals. Strong positive 
anomaly indicated by pronounced red hues. anomaly is shown in red and orange. 
  
Fig. 5: C i : | | 
"Band ratio (3/1, 5/7, 3/5 in R, G, B) image of Khor Fig. 6: Same area as in fig. 5. The anomaly (red/orange) 
exists in boue Rot quarter of image). No iron anomaly in the upper right quarter of the image does not corre- 
DoT. spond to any iron enrichment at the surface.