he
ral
(v
Dr
—r
Dr
INTRODUCTION
The hydro-electric power plant at Churchill Falls,
Labrador (Canada) is one of the largest power
generating facility in the world with a drainage
area of 69 267 km“ containing five reservoirs.
Monitoring the inflow from such a large
watershed area constitutes an important part of
the water management. This monitoring at the
present is conducted by field observations in
snow courses during the winter months. The
collection of field data is very expensive as most
of the snow courses can be reached only by a
helicopter and the results do not provide
accurate results. The field observations could be
supplemented by remotely sensed data
collection to improve the run-off modelling and
could make the procedure less expensive and
more accurate.
Researchers suggested that snow-water-
equivalent can be related to multi-channel
RADAR returns from the snow fields in open
areas (NASA , 1981 and Shi et.al., 1990). Since
the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS)
introduced a RADAR development program
with the use of an air borne X- (A=3.24 cm) and
C- (A=5.66 cm) band SAR we could designed an
experiment at Churchill Falls (in situ) to
investigate the usefulness of this system to
derive SWE. The RADAR development
program was the fore runner for the application
of a new Canadian RADARSAT satellite which
was launched in late 1995.
The experiment was designed such that SAR and
simultaneous ground data were collected in pre-
determined sites at several time intervals (with
and without snow cover). Statistical analysis of
the ground and RADAR data should provide an
estimate of SWE that could be built in a
hydrological model to predict spring run-off.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
The Earth Observation System approach
(NASA, 1981) uses L-, C-, and X- bands SAR
simultaneously over a snow field. This provides
three simultaneous equations from which the
37
SWE can be calculated. Since we had only two
bands (X- and C-) we planned to obtain SAR
data without snow cover after the freeze-up and
during the maximum snow cover. This would
replace the use of the L- band.
Bernier and Fortin (1991) evaluated the potential
of C- and X- band SAR to monitor dry and wet
snow cover. More recent applications of C-
band SAR for mapping melting snow (Donald
et.al. 1993) and mapping of discontinuous
permafrost terrain (Granberg, 1994) were
reported in the Canadian Journal of Remote
Sensing.
The determination of SWE requires the use of
calibrated SAR data. The incidence angle is one
of the most determining factor in analysis,
therefore, we chose two incidence angles (30^
and 60^) for our data acquisition.
Since the ground data collection had to follow
the SAR acquisition immediately, we could use
only a limited number of test sites. These sites
were chosen in open areas near to access roads.
Each target area consisted of a 60 to 120 m long
base line. Snow parameter data were to be
obtained at 6 m intervals along the base lines to
coincide with the CCRS SAR ground resolution
element.
On the advice of CCRS scientist we choose a
regression analysis design such that the ground
data (SWE) are correlated with single band and
multiple band multi-temporal SAR data.
Corner reflectors were manufactured for the
absolute calibration of SAR data. Two sets of
two reflectors (one for the X- and one for the C-
band) were placed in locations corresponding to
30? and 60" incidence angles.
DATA ACQUISITION
Air Borne SAR.
The snow free data were collected on October
30th, 1990 after the freeze-up with minimal
snow cover (less than 10 cm). This flight
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996