Full text: XVIIIth Congress (Part B7)

ry High 
2 (near 
1995, at 
)ased on 
provided 
rer 5000 
in such 
e of the 
' associ- 
ally sent 
hs Via a 
e direc- 
ry time 
cessing 
ATA 
NOAA 
he fires 
AVHRR 
1. Geo- 
jer day 
| of the 
tection 
em, the 
ised. 
ot per- 
of the 
umbers 
lese re- 
ecutive 
coming 
pectral 
e three 
than a 
nes are 
je geo- 
] every 
ta and 
  
   
   
Satellite 
image data 
  
  
   
    
   
   
Detection 
of error lines 
Archiving of 
orbit data 
     
  
Geo-coding 
  
  
      
  
Search of 
hot spots 
False alarm 
screening 
     
      
  
    
      
Generation Alert mes- 
of alert sage 
  
  
message 
DSPZÉEUEEEEEREESEE 
    
    
HEGRE 
Figure 1: Tasks in fire detection. 
the timing information extracted from the image data. This 
interpolation grid is then inverted and used when the image 
data are resampled to a regular pixel grid in the selected map 
projection (Gauss-Kriiger). 
Resampling is a critical step in image processing if the aim 
of the system is to detect small active fires. Usually a fire 
affects only one pixel in a NOAA image. If bi-linear interpo- 
lation is used in resampling, most of the one-pixel fire signals 
are rendered undetectable as a consequence of the averaging 
introduced. On the other hand, if cubic convolution is used, 
numerous false alarms are generated especially along sharp 
edges in connection of boundaries between clouds and cloud 
shadows. This is due to the edge enhancement that cubic- 
convolution resampling produces. The most suitable standard 
resampling technique for fire detection is the nearest neigh- 
bour resampling. If the pixel grid of the geo-coded image is 
dense enough (the inter-pixel distance of the AVHRR sensor 
at nadir is approximately 0.8 km), no fire signals are lost in 
the resampling and no false alarms are generated either. 
32 Fire Detection Algorithm 
As in many other systems, the detection of small fires is based 
on the use of band-3 data (wavelength 3.5 pm). All pixels 
that have a digital number less than a pre-determined thresh- 
old are considered to be potential fire pixels. These pixels are 
searched in the image and connected fire pixels are grouped 
together to form fire patches or "hot spots”. 
In addition to the spectral features used widely in fire detec- 
tion, the fire detection system takes into account the imaging 
geometry. The imaging geometry is represented by the devi- 
EAN 
1 UR 
= The digital-number scale in bands 3, 4, and 5 of the AVHRR sensor is 
versed so that high radiant power corresponds to low digital numbers and 
oy radiant power to high digital numbers. That is why low digital numbers 
Te sought for in fire detection, not high. 
585 
ation angle. The deviation angle o is the angle between the 
direction of reflected sun light and the line of sight from target 
to the sensor (figure 2). The deviation angle is computed: 
a marc cos( TR) (1) 
Sun 
C Sensor 
S 
R 
c 
/ 
^^target % 
Figure 2: The deviation angle between the vectors R (re- 
flected sun light) and S (target to sensor). 
A detected hot spot is considered to be a real fire only if it 
fulfils all of the following criteria: 
1. the deviation angle must be greater than a pre- 
determined threshold, 
2. the band-2 average of the hot spot must be smaller 
than a pre-determined threshold, 
3. the band-4 average of the hot spot must be smaller 
than a pre-determined threshold, 
4. the hot spot must be further than a pre-determined 
threshold away from the borders of the image swath, 
5. the number of pixels in the hot spot must be smaller 
than a pre-determined threshold. 
As in (Pereira and Setzer, 1993), the original digital num- 
bers are used as such and are not converted into tempera- 
ture units. Conversion to temperature units would make the 
thresholds directly comparable with those used in other sys- 
tems. It would not make the system more general because the 
thresholds must be adapted when moving from one ecosystem 
to another (Kennedy et a/ 1994). 
Despite the fact that the data are not converted to temper- 
ature units, the fire detection algorithm resembles the algo- 
rithm described by (Kennedy et a/ 1994). The search of hot 
spots based on band-3 data corresponds to criterion i. Crite- 
rion 3 corresponds to criterion iii and criterion 2 to criterion 
iv. The criterion ii is always fulfilled in hot spots detected 
in the Boreal forest zone where extremely hot natural targets 
are missing. The criteria of geometric nature (criteria 1, 4, 
and 5) in the list above are such elements in the algorithm 
that do not have counterparts in the algorithm described by 
(Kennedy et al 1994). 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B7. Vienna 1996 
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.