International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-5/W2, 2013
XXIV International CIPA Symposium, 2 — 6 September 2013, Strasbourg, France
which was not used in this case.
The hyperspectral instrument is placed on a medium
size motorized moving platform designed by Headwall
Photonics, Inc. named Pan&tilt [15], that provides accurate
real-time positioning of the hyperspectral equipment. The
imaging spectrometer has been calibrated by the manufacturer.
Illumination was a big issue when dealing with
historic paintings. The temperature of the painting must not
exceed 35°C, which was monitored using thermometer.
Illumination was accomplished by two 500Watt Halogen lamps
supplemented with one 150Watt infrared bulb.
3. PAINTINGS
Two different paintings were examined. Both pieces
of art are oil paintings on wooden board. This combination was
chosen because of the possibility of underdrawing visualization
which is supposed to be the most uncomplicated painting
combination for this type of analysis.
The first chosen painting for the analysis is by
David II. Teniers and it belongs to the best that Flemish
classical 1 7th-century painting can offer. Teniers painted almost
every kind of picture, but chiefly genre scenes of peasant life,
which is typical subject for this historical period and the area,
many of which were subsequently used for tapestry designs in
the 18th century [16]. He was born in 1610 in Antwerp to the
family with a long artistic tradition. His father David Teniers
the Elder was respected painter, influenced directly by misters
such as Rubens or Elsheimer. Early works of David II. Teniers
shows also the influence of Adriaen Brouwer. He has achieved
a great success already during his lifetime. Besides his
prestigious position of the court painter of the Archduke
Leopold Wilhelm, he was appointed as a keeper of the
collection of pictures the Archduke was then forming. Finally
he was of the prime movers of the foundation the Brussels
Academy of Fine Arts (1663) and subsequently the Academy in
Antwerp (1665). His artwork belongs to the golden age of
Flemish and Duch painting. Especially his early works are of
significant high quality. They are characterized by extreme ease
of painting, fascinating effects of lights and shadows, perfect
sense for detail, astonishing amount of acquired knowledge and
natural good taste. All of these characteristics are relevant for
chosen painting “Interior of a Mill”. This oil on panel painting
of medium size is dated 1633 approximately. It displays an
interior of the old mill with a small figure in the background.
We can notice the significant sense for detail and very delicate,
limited range of colors. However Teniers was very skillful
painter and his production was enormous. There are over 900
paintings accepted as original productions of Teniers. Few
artists ever worked with greater ease, and some of his smaller
pictures, landscapes with figures, have been called "afternoons",
not from their subjects, but from the time spent in producing
them. Although copying of successful motifs was very common
in these times, maybe the high productivity of Teniers caused a
slight stereotype in his later work. Despite this fact he has
many followers and one of them is his favorite student Thomas
van Apshoven (1622 and 1665).
The second piece of art was made by Terniers pupil
Thomas van Apshoven. He lived also in Antwerpen between
years 1622 and 1665. In most of the cases, Thomas van
Apshoven imitated his master’s style and his paintings can be
easily mistaken. Also subjects of his paintings, like those of his
master, are village festivals, interiors and genre scenes. [17].
Painting ,, On the Road", the second chosen piece of art, is an
426
oil painting on wooden board which displays classical scene of
the Flemish countryside.
Figure 2 — Explored painting by David Ternier the Younger
,The Interieour of the Mill" as seen in daylight
Figure 3 — Explored painting by Thomas van Apshoven “On
the Road” as seen in daylight
4. RESULTS
The painting was placed on an easel in front of the
hyperspectral sensor and illuminated as mentioned above. The
scanning distance was set to 1,5m, so the pixel size is 0.33mm.
The piece of art had to be treated with big care, because when
illuminated by too powerful instruments for a long time the oil
can be affected or even destroyed. The maximum temperature
cannot exceed 35°C or a serious damage can occur. The
illumination parameters were discussed with the manufacturer
and used as mentioned above. The temperature of the painting
was observed by a thermometer and cooling was performed by a
fan. Ventilation of the air next to the scanned painting and the
temperature did not exceed 30°C. The scanning speed was set to
the minimum (10 frames/um) and the exposure time to
maximum (40,23 um) to enable the maximum light to come to
the detector. Scanning angle and the number of frames had to be
set to cover the entire image. White and dark reference was
performed by the XCAP software provided by the manufacturer.
One detail was used for each painting. Details were
chosen in respect to IR reflectography and the visibility of
underdrawings. For Ternier it was the low-left corner showing
barrels and the millers working desk (see figure 4) and for Van
Apshoven it was the house on the horizon in the right half of the
painting (see figure 5). The details are a RGB image synthesis
as derived from hyperspectral image (Red A = 629,93nm; Green
À = 529,89nm; Blue À = 449,87nm)