2.1. Basic topographic map (TTN)
Slovenia is one of the few countries having the entire territory
of the state covered with map 4 scale 1: 5000 (partly at scale
1: 10,000) named Basic Topographic Map (TTN). There are
2802 map sheets produced in 1960-ies using analogue
technology. Maintenance of such amount of map sheets became
impossible. Majority of sheets has outdated contents. The first
replacements were 3258 digital orthophoto map sheets with
resolution 0.5 m (DOF) and completed in 2002. Simultaneous
establishment of topographic database at scale 1: 5,000
(TOPO 5) started in 1999 after some previous research and test
projects (Radovan et al, 1998). The basic aim of the database is
to provide digital data at scale 1: 5,000 for the most demanding
object classes and to digitally produce map at scale 1: 5,000 as a
result of visualisation. of the database. The project is a
compromise between professional solution and available
resources. The main source for data acquisition are stereo
images at scale 1: 17,500 and digital orthophoto map at scale
1: 5,000 (DOF).
Figure 2: Orthophoto map 1: 5,000 (DOF)
2.1.1 Large Scale Topographic Database (TOPO 5)
Large scale topographic database (TOPO 5) was developed
because of the lack of digital topographic data of sufficient
accuracy. The objective was to include data from various
databases that are maintained by Surveying and Mapping
Authority of Republic of Slovenia or other state services and
create a database that links digital databases of different
institutions at minimal additional acquisition of topographic
data. The result is a topographic database with accuracy and
detail that meets scale 1:5,000 and as such succeeds existing
Basic Topographic Map (TTN). TOPO 5 is produced in form of
sheets with dimension of 50 x 70 cm. Each sheet represents an
area of 2250 m x 3000 m, which corresponds to sheet division
of TTN or DOF.
Establishment of topographical database and operational data
acquisition started in 1999. Initial phases involved definition of
database contents (including attributes) and format of the
database. Because of all that the first sheets of TOPO 5 are not
consistent with respect to database format and layer partition. In
the year 2002 all that was harmonised.
From that point on the database is in ESRI shape format that
consists of three types of files *.shp, *.dbf, *.shx. TOPO Sis a
vector database with graphical and descriptive part. With regard
to the contents the database is divided into following object
classes:
© structures
e traffic
e land cover
e hydrography
Each of the object classes is furthermore divided into object
types (see Table 1).
Object class
100 Structures
Object type
101 Building
102 Electric wire
103 High object
201 Road
202 Railway line
203 Cableway
301 Vegetation
302 Land in special use
401 Water
402 Watercourse
403 Feature on watercourse
200 Traffic
300 Land cover
400 Hydrography
Table 1: Subdivision of object classes in TOPO 5
Each object type has obligatory set of attributes and appropriate
values. Number of attributes depends upon individual object
type, but date of source and method of acquisition are common
to all.
Source data for acquisition of TOPO 5 contents are:
a) photogrametric material:
e scans of the latest images from the
permanent aerial survey
e aerial triangulation data
b) scan of the TTN (combined layer, hydrographic layer)
c) segment of the TOPO 5 (if one exists)
e for area of interest
e for neighbouring area
d) digital orthophoto-map (DOF), resolution 0.5 m
e) segment of the cadastre of buildings
f) segment of the toponym register (REZI)
g) segment of the state road database
h) segment of the register of land usage (ERZ)
i) information about municipal roads — database of road
data (BCP) (if available)
j) additional data from SMA RS (if needed )
Analysis of the workflow in the year 2002 has shown that two
fields were causing problems:
e acquisition of vegetation data based on ERZ
e selection of appropriate method of attribute
acquisition and consequently date of source data
ERZ is a vegetation database acquired according to agricultural
criteria of land usage and established by the Ministry of
Agriculture, Forestry and Food (MKGP). These criteria and
categorisation of data are so different from that of topographic
database, that a lot of adjustments and additional acquisition of
206
data v
did n
harmc
decisi:
photo;
help 1i
Differ
situati
multir
origin
interpi
combi
misint
dilemi
Surve:
planni
These
Slover
little n
21.2
main ri
standai
such p