Full text: Resource and environmental monitoring

  
  
  
   
  
   
10 band airborne image 
1m resolution 
  
  
  
select bands R, G, NIR 
EE 
CIR (1m) coim MS, 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
averaging image 
| subsampling 
fsimulaled saleilile produci LUG 
t |panchromatic CIR (4m) ; —  MSam 
; | Image (1m) image ; 
i interpolation 
RE iia 
interpolated |! 
+ Comparison 
MSinterp 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
fusion-sharpened ||| _ PSM 1m 
CIR image (1m) 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Figure 2: Simulation of the satellite imagery, image fusion, 
and comparison with the true 1 m imagery. 
4 COMPARISON BETWEEN FUSED IMAGE AND 
FULL-RESOLUTION IMAGE 
Although the result of the fusion-sharpening appears 
surprisingly sharp and very satisfactory to the eye, its 
spectral truth remains to be checked quantitatively. 
When the real satellite imagery becomes available, data 
fusion in order to yield highly resolved color images will 
certainly be performed. However, the accuracy of the es- 
timated color values will remain unknown, and thus also 
the errors which propagate through later image process- 
ing steps such as land cover classification, change detec- 
tion, NDVI computation, etc. 
In contrast, with the airborne / simulated imagery we 
are in a position to immediately check the deviation be- 
tween the multispectral imagery which is truly sam- 
pled with 1 m ground resolution and the one interpolated 
from 4m resolution by data fusion with 1m panchro- 
matic resolution. 
The flow chart in Fig. 2 shows the steps involved in the 
simulation of the panchromatic and color infrared im- 
ages, the fusion and the comparison. 
4.1 Spectral Accuracy of the Fused Image 
We compare the reflectance values r; of the spectral 
bands i € (NIR,R,G) of the fusion-sharpened PSM;4- 
image with the color infrared MS;4-image which is truly 
sampled at 1m. In Fig. 4 the correlation between the 
MS ım-image and the fused PSM,m-image is shown for 
the bands Near Infrared, Red and Green. Each pixel de- 
fined by its spatial coordinates has two reflectance val- 
ues, one in the original and one in the fused image, so 
every point in the scatter plot represents one pixel. If 
both images were identical, all the points would be lo- 
  
Figure 3: The cubic spline-interpolated CIR image! and the 
final fusion-sharpened CIR image! from panchromatic image 
(1m) and interpolated color infrared image (4 m). 
288 International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998 
  
  
cate 
tati 
the 
ues 
(97° 
seer 
gori 
that 
spec 
refle 
tion 
ther 
(see 
4.2 
The 
feat 
is de 
whe 
ban: 
rela: 
is tl 
tral 
serv 
affec 
mat; 
panc 
pari: 
imag 
of > 
4.3 
Part 
ful t: 
ture 
borh 
meal 
arou
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.