Fuzzy
use of it.
ms since ‘
sis in the
allows to
iltisource
ow in an
ervations
portant in
needs
the time
s are the
arth area
s a day),
resolution
it; on the
! (around
y contain
-to snow
following
e there
3. CLASSIFICATION MISTAKES OF MIXED PIXELS
The core of the remote sensing approach for this analysis
is the image classification. Since snow and non-snow
covered soils, have quite different radiometric behaviours
they can be easy identified if they are observed in
different pixels.
The classic remote sensing approach performs snow
layer monitoring regardless of mistakes and lacks of
precision due to mixed pixels ignoring. In fact the classical
approach to the classification problem, assigns each pixel
to an exact class, basing on radiometric considerations,
allowing the unclassified class for the too much uncertain
ones. Each pixel of a classified image belongs to a unique
class and does not belong to all the other classes; the
different classification methods (maximum likelihood,
minimum distance, parallelepiped, and so on) are different
rules to choose the classes. Mixed pixels can be assigned
only to a single class and so their allocation is very
delicate; in fact the overall behaviour of mixed pixel (e.g.
class A plus class B) can be more similar to the behaviour
of another class C than to the original class A and class B
behaviours and so the pixel A+B is assigned neither to A
nor to B but to C class.
A mixed pixel (A+B) can be assigned in the following
wrong ways:
1 Assigned only to class A or only to class B;
Il. Assigned to unclassified class;
It. Assigned to a class C.
The tree above wrong ways have quite different
meanings. In fact the first and the second are similar to
information losses, in the first case only a part of the pixel
nature is ignored and in the second all is ignored;
otherwise, the third one is a completely wrong assignment
and it can be very dangerous because it is a kind of
information flake.
The following images in figure 2 show the three wrong
classification ways :
Real pixel composition
real pixel composition: snow in light grey and green in
dark grey
| wrong way
mixed pixels are assigned to the more present class
Il wrong way
unclassified
|
unclassified : |
unciassiffed |
Tn ed |
| unclassified
mixed pixels are assigned to the unclassified class
Ill wrong way
mixed pixels are assigned to an extraneous class
Figure 2: three wrong assignment ways for mixed pixels
4. CLASSICAL CLASSIFICATION APPROACH
Mixed pixels are not treated as mixed using a classical
approach. For instance, snow layer borderline is classified
as cloudy area since the radiometric behaviour of snow-
green mixed pixels is often similar to the cloudy areas
one.
In order to highlight the mixed pixels variable classification
different classic classification ways are performed and the
results compared together.
The first image is part of a NOAA image of Alps region
recorded second May 1997 at 12.30. (Figure 3).
The AVHRR scanner carried on NOAA satellites records
data at 1.1 Km resolution in the following channels:
0.50 - 0.68 um
0.725 — 1.10 um
3.55 — 3.93 um
10.30 — 11.30 um
11.50 — 12.50 um.
> a * > à aie M
05 N} à m ^
- 3 YA Wet eL a
+
wid
Fig. 3 Part of NOAA image used to perform the analysis.
Intemational Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998 329