Full text: Resource and environmental monitoring

  
MONITORING HIGH MOUNTAIN SNOWCOVER USING DATA FUSION 
TECHNIQUES 
Harold HAEFNER and Jens PIESBERGEN 
Remote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography 
University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland 
e-mail address: {haefner, piesi}@geo.unizh.ch 
Fax No. +41 1 635 68 42 
ISPRS Commission VII Working Group 4 
Snow Cover Monitoring, Data Fusion Techniques, ERS SAR, Landsat TM, Radarsat 
ScanSar 
KEY WORDS: 
ABSTRACT 
A continuous snowcover monitoring in time and space represents the basis for all snowhydrologi-' 
cal applications, and is an important factor for studying climatic change as well. For applica- 
tions in high mountain regions, the unstable weather conditions ask for the use of SAR satellite 
data. But SAR imaging properties require specific methods to reduce or even eliminate the relief 
induced distortions to ensure a continuous areal snowcover mapping. In addition, characteristic 
problems have to be solved regarding classification methods and accuracy when working on differ- 
ent scales. Three test sites in the Swiss Alps, reaching from very large to very small scale, 
have been investigated. Studies based solely on the use of single frequency, single polarization 
synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data demonstrate that wetness maps can be compiled, and a moni- 
toring of the snow melting process is possible over a long-term period. Analyzing advantages and 
disadvantages of the use of EO and SAR sensors, it can be concluded that EO data are more suit- 
able for snowcover mapping purposes. On the other hand, SAR systems are absolutely necessary to 
retrieve certain snow parameters and to continuously monitor the melting process. The goal of 
our project is to take advantage of the synergism of EO and SAR systems using data fusion tech- 
niques, and to monitor the melting process over large mountainous areas. The completion of the 
first objective consists of a rigorous calibration of the remote sensing data in respect to the 
geometry and the radiometry, using digital elevation models and sensor orbital data. While in 
optical imagery, illumination and atmospheric corrections are additionally considered, a fully 
thematic information of SAR data can only be achieved applying the optimal resolution approach 
(ORA). In a further step, EO and SAR data are fused pixel by pixel, using a colour transforma- 
tion, in order to reduce misclassifications. First, a simple fusion model is applied, and then 
the basic model is extended, to take into account the temporal attributes between data sources 
acquired at different dates based on the multitemporal optimal resolution approach (MORA). The 
method decreases the misclassification significantly. Results of snowcover mapping and monitor- 
ing from the medium size test area GRISONS are presented to illustrate the methodological prin- 
ciples. 
a combination with SAR data is the only possi- 
bility to achieve a continuous monitoring dur- 
1. INTRODUCTION 
  
  
The seasonal snowcover has a significant im- 
pact on geoecological processes and human ac- 
tivities. These effects get of special impor- 
tance in high mountain terrain. But snow is 
not only a valuable resource, it can also turn 
into a menacing natural hazard. Furthermore, 
its changes are an important parameter for 
studying climatic change. 
Hence, a continuous snowcover monitoring in 
time and space forms the basis for all snowhy- 
drological applications. But in high mountain 
regions, the unstable weather conditions ham- 
per the use of optical EO data. Consequently, 
ing the accumulation and melting process of 
the snowcover in small individual basins or 
over large mountain areas. Another possibility 
would be to relay on radar sensors only. But 
snow mapping based solely on a single fre- 
quency, single polarization, C-band SAR system 
(such as ERS) is not suitable for operational 
purposes. SAR imaging properties require spe- 
cific methods to eliminate or at least reduce 
the relief induced distortions. Multifrequency 
polarimetric radar data (SIR-C/X-SAR) allow a 
much better classification of the areal extent 
of the snowcover, even of dry snow, as well as 
an assessment of the water equivalent. It is 
350 International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998 
adva 
and 
syst 
diti 
solv 
over 
To .: 
clas 
accu 
ate 
data 
site 
1). 
aski 
larg 
regi 
els 
tion 
tics 
avai 
Tabl 
Snow 
or £ 
cuss 
Haef 
Stei 
Afte 
rect 
1997 
sis 
red, 
blue 
type 
Snow 
Refl 
(cha 
Snow 
rela 
soil
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.