S. CONCLUSION 
Both types of DEM were applied. Aerial photos are 
  
more operational, they can be repeated far more 
frequently for time changes detection. These photos 
have worse accuracy in forest areas where the Earth 
surface is hidden under a forest cover. KE 
References: 
Hansen, A., (1984). Landslide hazard analysis. In: 
Slope instability. D. Brunsden and D.B.Prior (eds) 
Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 523-602 | Thi 
| on 
Burrough, P.A. , (1986). Principal of Geographical | Inte 
Infromation System for Land Resources Assessment. the 
Clarendon Press, Oxford 194pp. mir 
Kienholz, H., Mani, P. and Klay, M., (1988). Rigi 
Nordlene. Beurteilung der Naturgefahren und 
Waldbauliche Prioritatenfestlegung. Proceedings 
INTERPREAVENT 1988, Graz, Austria, Band I., pp SIR 
161-174. cc 
key 
Berknopf, R.L. et al. (1988). A probabilistic approach the 
( 
to landslide hazard mapping in Cincinatti, Ohio, with 
applications for economic evaluation. Bulletin rad: 
International Association of Engineering Geology, Vol. | Scal 
25, NO L., pp. 39-56. prin 
IS 
spe 
| visil 
acti 
recc 
pass 
look 
info 
rada 
infr: 
atter 
mad 
char 
imag 
back 
back 
Wavi 
geor 
roug 
cons 
locat 
inter 
radai 
insta 
lines 
  
590 Intemational Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998