e. But,
)ecause
ness by
ces the
NU
<
z
o. Huis, Areas without deterioration =
SSS Moderately-deteriorated areas A se
o ELO Seriously-deteriorated areas z x
w 7 - A
E
od -E
r SS NN S
mut Neh
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
(m)
Fig-10 Relationship between elevation and the degree of deterioration
Areas without deterioration
Nw Moderately-deteriorated areas
dk UN
3 Seriously-deteriorated areas
Od:
7
2^
of A
Wh
se
rds
15 20 25 30 &
TN
10
-
ZA
Gl
4
e
4
A
77
e
A
LE.
5
e
FS S.
KAS
2)
ROSE Yo
NEE
EDEN ES
N NS
AM Cu re
NN
PA)
ANN
XA
2 AC
VA
A DA GE
GE ESS
d fe y
2
AAT US
7
u
7,
^
7
y
2477
GE
/
v
A
VIE
GE
AA
ws
o
0
-
ed
-
Ta
Fig-11 Relationship between slope gradient and the degree of deterioration
(%)
9 4 E: SEE
© NN
eo.
<
© —-
Q
o Areas without Moderately-
deterioration deteriorated areas deteriorated areas
Fig-12 Relationship between slope aspects and the degree of
deterioration
Intemational Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998
717