REFERENCES
Ahern F.J., Goodenough D.C., Jain S.C., Rao V.R. and
Rochon G. 1977; Use of clear lakes as standard reflectors for
atmospheric measurements. In Proc. 71th Int. Symp. on Remote
Sens. Environ., Ann Arbor, Mi, pp. 731-755.
Chavez P.S., Jr. 1988; An improved dark-object subtraction
technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral
data, Remote Sens. Environ. 24, pp. 459-474.
Ferencz Cs., Tarcsai Gy., Lichtenberger J. 1993; Correction of
atmospheric effects of satellite remote sensing data (Landsat
MSS, NOAA AVHRR) for surface canopy investigations, Int.
J. Remote Sens., 14, p. 3417.
Hamar D., Ferencz Cs., Lichtenberger J., Tarcsai Gy., F.
Arkos L, 1995; Yield estimation for corn and wheat in the
Hungarian Great Plain using Landsat MSS data, submitted to
Int. J. Remote Sens., 17, pp. 1689-1669.
Holm R.G., Moran S.M., Jackson R.D., Slater P.N., YuanB.,
Biggar S.F. 1989; Surface reflectance factor retrieval from
Thematic Mapper data, Remote Sens Environ. 22, pp. 47-57.
Kneizys F.X., Shettle E.F., Abreau L.W. 1988; Users guide
for LOWTRAN 7, Report AFGL-TR-88-0177.
Moran S.M., Jackson R.D., Slater P.N., Teillet P.M. 1992:
Evaluation of simplified procedure for retrieval of land surface
reflectance factors from satellite sensor output, Remote Sens.
Environ., 40, pp. 1-20.
Rahman H. and Dedieu G. 1994; SMAC: a simplified method
for the atmospheric correction of satellite measurements in the
solar spectrum, Int. J. Remote Sens., 15, pp. 123-143.
Richter R. 1990; A fast atmospheric correction algorithm
applied to Landsat TM images, Int. J. Remote Sens., 11, pp.
159-166.
Tanré D., Deroo C., Dahaut P. 1985; Effects atmospheriques
en teledetection logiciel de simulation de signal satellitaire dans
le spectre solaire, in Proc. 7th Intl. Colloq. on Spec. Signatures
of Objects in Remote Sens., ESA SP., pp. 315-319.
0.4
CORN
2 0.3
D
C
C
Qo
© 0.2
= b
0.1
a
Ë
0.0 + y
100 150 200 269 0
Figure 1 Comparison of greenness profiles calculated for 218
corn fields from MSS data GN (a) and for 5 groups of AVHRR
HRPT pixels (GNAV) dominated by corn (b). The MSS data
were corrected by the ATMOYE code, the AVHRR data were
processed by the ATMAVHRR code.
Greenness vs. Brightness based on Abstract. TC
0.25 ; meee
i
eed t |
tes 1 100
0.20 gout .
20.02 a3
34
ate 5 y! A 75
0:15 q^?"
*
|
2v] 45:23
0.05: à e 20
| V
! $ : a
0.00 | : e À / 2
| s. % a
| 2
1 6
-0.05 | o
| Percent cover Ë
*
| =
—() 10 fer rer 17 Bi LER A FIT TY m
-0.05 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45
Br
Figure 2 Results of model calculations: Greenness versus
Brightness for different soil moisture contents, percent covers
and visibilities based on Abstract Tasseled Cap.
790 International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXII, Part 7, Budapest, 1998
vi
