Port
Starboard
performing such analysis, it must be assumed that the
acoustical data obtained by scientific echo-sounders
are representative samples of a population.
However the effect of an approaching ship on a fish
school must be considered. Misund and Aglen
(1992a) observed with sonar that herring schools
escape from purse seine fishing boats. They
suggested that it is necessary to grasp the three-
dimensional directivity pattern of underwater noise
radiated from a ship and determine how noise affects
fish behavior. To determine how a fish school reacts to
a moving ship, horizontal projections were sliced into
10m-deep layers, and counted the fish schools
appeared by the distance from the ship's course
(Figure 9). In the figure, the horizontal projection (B) is
made by the specified layer from 20m to 30m in depth
in the side projection (A), and the histogram of fish
appearance against to the distance from the ship (C).
: TS Frequenc
Horizontal projection o of mney
OI
souereadde Jooyog
Vertical projection
Extracted layer
20~30m
Figure 9 Fish school distribution obtained by
horizontal projection of specified layer.
Figure 10 displays the frequency distribution of fish
schools that appeared in each layer. The vertical axis
indicates the number of fish, and the horizontal axis
indicates the distance from the ship track. The central
vertical broken line denotes the area just under the
ship. If fish did not avoid the ship, each chart would
show a flat distribution despite of distance from the
ship. However it is clear in the top three charts that the
shallower fish schools showed a large bias from the
center, while the bottom two charts show nearly flat
distributions. These figures suggest that fish schools
possibly avoid ships, especially in shallow waters
(Misund, 1990, 1993a).
Misund (1994) observed the swimming direction of
herring schools during trawl fishing and found that the
schools escaped in the same direction as the ship was
moving, not to the sides. He suggested that the
732
directivity of underwater noise emitted by ships is
strong in the broadside direction and weak forward
and to the rear of the ships. By determining the three-
dimensional directivity pattern of underwater noise
emitted by ships, the bias of fish school distribution
patterns just under ships will be elucidated.
40 Fr
30 b 10—20m
20 D, Dun ——L
10 f a |
O A a A
40
Ww
o
pop
Ww
o
n
©
8
NO
oo
TT TU
50 — 60m
Port Center Starboa
100m 100m
30 F
Figure 10 Frequency distribution of fish school
appearance in relation to fish avoidance.
4.2 Species classification by characteristics of fish
school shape
If a fish school is observed, it is useful to identify the
species and to predict the behavior of the school (Weill
et al., 1993, Lu and Lee, 1995, Reid and Simmonds,
1993). Unfortunately, optical observation using
underwater cameras is limited to close range because
of the rapid attenuation of light in seawater (Pitcher
and Partridge, 1979).
Hara (1985) observed from an airplane that moving
sardine schools are crescent shaped, with the convex
side facing forwards the direction of movement. In this
study, fish schools observed by sonar were classified
into several shape types. In order to test the
relationship between the shape and species or
behavior, the volume, lengthwise-to-crosswise ratio
(elongation), circularity, fractal dimension, and fish
school depth were extracted as characteristic
parameters of each fish school shape.
Figure 11 shows the scattergram matrix of three
representative parameters: school depth, elongation,
and school volume (logarithmic value). The
relationship between these parameters show that
small fish schools often occurred in deep water, and
St
a “no az
—
m
«" "r3 T3 —1 CO) «€ t3 CY) a (MN. DO: —*
DO -T—
ar