Full text: Mapping surface structure and topography by airborne and spaceborne lasers

    
‚ CA, 9-11 Nov. 1999 
  
es and laser points. 
' the merged data. Constrained 
the use of the breaklines. The 
shown in Figure 5. Comparing 
surface provides a better 
ian the surface generated using 
int only define the rooflines. To 
ngs, the roofline is projected on 
S à breakline, thus defining the 
to the roofs. The result of this 
ice utilizing both the breaklines 
the buildings than either of the 
e data acquisition method, and 
line to the ground surface is 
buildings. 
nent of a general scheme for the 
rammetric data. This scheme 
face registration algorithm and a 
ing of the integration algorithm 
over Ocean City, MD, and has 
ccurately represented than when 
s paper is applicable to the 
ible surface models for the 
n urban areas. The use of the 
discontinuities will allow the 
t does not have the distortions 
in the surface models which are 
d DEMs. Continued research is 
ition of the approach, to extract 
determine the ground height in 
supported by the United States- 
ion, grant no. 97-00433. 
    
4690 4700 4710 A720 —— 
  
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 3W14, La Jolla, CA, 9-11 Nov. 1999 
  
Figure 4. Surface from laser data. 
1980" >. 
T. mE 
1970 et A660. 
1960 
  
Figure 5. New surface using breaklines and laser data. 
       
     
   
  
  
  
  
Figure 6. Incorporation of vertical projection of roofline to ground surface. 
2000 à vue 
1990 = Es 
com 4680 
1970 > 7 4660 
1960 
REFERENCES 
Ackermann, F., 1999. Airborne laser scanning — present status 
and future expectations. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and 
Remote Sensing, 54(1), pp. 64-67. 
Axelsson, P., 1998. Integrated sensors for platform orientation 
and topographic data acquisition. In: Symposium on Digital 
Photogrammetry, Istanbul, pp. 1-11. 
Axelsson, P., 1999. Processing of laser scanner data - algorithms 
and applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote 
Sensing, 54(1), pp. 138-147. 
Baltsavias, E., 1999. A comparison between photogrammetry and 
laser scanning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote 
Sensing, 54(1), pp. 83-94. 
Brenner, C., 1999. Interactive modelling tools for 3D building 
reconstruction. 47 Photogrammetric Week, Stuttgart, 
Wichmann, pp. 23-34. 
Cord, M., Jordan, M., Cocquerez, J.-P. and Paparoditis, N., 1999. 
Automatic extraction and modelling of urban buildings from high 
resolution aerial images. [International Archives of 
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Munich, Vol. XXXII, Part 
3-2W5, pp. 187-192. 
Csathó, B., Schenk, T., Lee, D.-C. and Filin, S., 1999. Inclusion 
of multispectral data into object recognition. International 
Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Valladolid, 
Spain, Vol. XXXII, Part 7-4-3W6, 8 pages. 
  
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.