11 Nov. 1999
Data post-processing of
TM production. 47%
nann, pp. 233-240.
ination of terrain models
iner data. /SPRS Journal
, 53(4), pp. 193-203.
New investigations into
)EM generation. ACSM /
\SPRS, Charlotte, North
formation from airborne
ce and Remote Sensing
. 423-426.
nan, P., 1997. Building
ter DEMs and 2D digital
grammetry and Remote
W2, pp. 42-49.
dels by laser scanning.
5-109.
1999. Laser scanning —
ing a new technique for
lels. ISPRS Journal of
4(1), pp. 95-104.
, K., 1999. Registration
ated by photogrammetric
ipping Surface Structure
eborne Lasers, La Jolla,
)ptimal infinite impulse
ctors. Computer Vision,
pp. 224-243.
ptual issues of softcopy
orammetric Engineering
1999. Improved DEM
R data with direct digital
nal Workshop on Mobile
nd, April 21-23, 1999, 7
and Rabine, D., 1996.
itimeter measurements.
, 17(11), pp. 2185-2200.
Predicting and solving
leration: the case of
ternational Archives of
Aunich, Vol. XXXII, Part
uction using planar faces
iternational Archives of
Aunich, Vol. XXXII, Part
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Part 3W14, La Jolla, CA, 9-11 Nov. 1999
REGISTRATION OF AIRBORNE LASER DATA TO SURFACES GENERATED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MEANS
Y. Postolov, A. Krupnik, K. McIntosh
Department of Civil Engineering, Technion — Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
{yurip, krupnik, kerry} @tx.technion.ac.il
Commission III, Working Group 2
KEY WORDS: Surface Registration, Laser, Photogrammetry.
ABSTRACT
Laser altimetry has provided a source of elevation information, which is both accurate and spatially dense. This information is beneficial
for the production of visible surface models, especially in areas where traditional photogrammetric methods are unable to provide
accurate heights. Although laser altimetry has many benefits, it also has limitations due to its lack of thematic information and due to
calibration errors that may occur during data acquisition. Therefore, it would be beneficial to use both laser data and photogrammetric
data to achieve the best results. To work with both data sets simultaneously, it must be ensured that the data sets are accurately
registered. The research presented in this paper describes an algorithm developed specifically for registering surfaces acquired using
different methods, and in particular, laser altimetry and photogrammetry.
The surface registration algorithm uses the difference in elevation between the surfaces and the gradients of the surfaces to produce
observation equations. These are solved using an iterative least-squares adjustment. The transformation parameters that are determined
by the algorithm include scale, translations and rotations. Testing was undertaken to assess the capabilities of the algorithm. Initial tests
were carried out using synthetic data sets with known transformations. Further testing was undertaken using airborne laser data and
aerial imagery covering an urban site located at Ocean City, Maryland. The results of the testing with this data set showed a systematic
error in the location of the laser data as compared to the photogrammetric data. This paper details the approach taken, including the
presentation of the equations used to determine the relevant transformation parameters, and the results of the initial experimentation.
1 INTRODUCTION
Airborne laser altimetry provides accurate surface points for
obtaining a digital surface model (DSM). The trend towards
using laser altimetry is motivated by the high spatial frequency of
the data, the efficiency of the data capture, and the minimal data
processing required. Laser altimetry has benefits as it can
provide measurements in areas where traditional
photogrammetric techniques encounter problems. Such areas
include urban areas, wooded areas and areas that produce little or
no texture or contrast in the digital imagery being used.
Following this determination, laser data can be considered as
complementary to photogrammetric techniques and would
provide benefits when combined with data obtained from these
methods. This approach has been suggested recently by many
researchers (Ackermann, 1999; Axelsson, 1999; Baltsavias, 1999;
Brenner, 1999; Csathó et al., 1999; Fritsch, 1999; Haala, 1999;
Haala and Anders, 1997; Toth and Grejner-Brzezinska, 1999; and
Vosselman 1999).
Utilizing data from both laser altimetry and photogrammetry
requires that the two data sets relate to the same coordinate
system. To ensure this is the case, the surfaces generated from
the data sets must be registered as accurately as possible. The
algorithm presented in this paper is specifically designed for
registering surfaces derived from laser data and photogrammetric
data.
The transformation parameters between two surfaces, which both
contain irregularly distributed points, are determined without
requiring the surfaces to be interpolated to a regular grid. These
parameters represent a three-dimensional conformal
transformation, and include scale, translations and rotations.
Observation equations are based on the difference in elevation
between the surfaces and the local gradients. The parameters are
estimated using an iterative least-squares solution.
Testing was undertaken to assess the capability of the algorithm
to accurately register two surfaces. Initial tests were carried out
using synthetic data sets with known transformations. These tests
were useful to show the validity of the algorithm, and also to
eliminate any implementation flaws. The sensitivity of the
algorithm to random errors was investigated by introducing such
errors to the data sets. Further testing has been undertaken using
airborne laser data and aerial imagery covering an urban site over
Ocean City, Maryland.
In section 2, the suggested approach is described in detail,
together with the mathematical model. Section 3 presents the
results obtained so far. Results from both synthetic and real data
experiments are shown.
2 MATHEMATICAL BACKGROUND OF THE
PROPOSED SURFACE MATCHING PROCEDURE
The aim of the surface matching procedure is to register the
airborne laser data to the surface generated by photogrammetric
means, thus allowing the surfaces to be transformed to a common
coordinate system. The most common methods for determining
the orientation parameters between two data sets are based on
conjugate points. These methods are not applicable when using
airborne laser data as the laser measurement is referring to a
footprint, and not to a specific point which can be identified on
the ground (Baltsavias, 1999). The similarity between the height