all real and its eigenvectors mutually orthogonal. Eigenvectors
give information on the various contributions of measurements to
the determination of the profile. For instance,eigenvectors assoc-
iated with the largest eigenvalue "sees" the dot product of the
required profile with the average of kernels,while eigenvectors
associated with the smallest eigenvalue "sees" the high frequency
part of the spectrum or the finest structure in the profile and
responds only very weakly. It could only be extracted by very
accurate measurements. In addition,optimum selection of observat-
ional channels(Weinreb and Crosby,1972;Kaplan,1977)-which repres-
ent interelectrode spacing in our case- is also an important part
of the design of the remote sensing experiment. It also requires
eigenanalysis which is under current consideration.
For an indication of the range of depths over which two over-
lapping kernels may be used for profile retreival,Heintzenberg et
a1,1981 have suggested using the ratio of kernels. This is shown
in Fig(2) as applied to the resistivity sounding problem. In the
depth range over which the ratio of kernels is a constant,no new
information about the resistivity profile could be retreived from
measurements with these two channels,since one kernel could be
obtained from the other through multiplication by a constant. Only
over the range of depths-indicated by arrows- for which the ratio
between kernels is not à constant,could the resistivity profile be
retreived using measurements corresponding to the two kernels.
IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSION:
The analogy to the atmospheric remote sensing problem
suggests the following implications:
1)- A small set of suitably related measurements could produce
nearly the same resistivity profile as a larger set chosen
without optimization,for the same allowed measurement error.
(2)- It is possible to increase the resolution at any depth by
inverting higher derivatives of kernels near the depth of
interest in à way similar to that suggested by Abbas,1979. In
addition,actual depth investigation characteristics-in the
nonlinear resistivity profile medium- are obtained from final
modification of the lower resolution configuration.
(3)- Measurements using combinations of different array configura-
tions could,therefore,be inverted to obtain resistivity
profiles subject only to the condition that different kernels
are suitably related.
(4)- Bigenanalysis of actual kernels could give information concer-
ning optimum separation of electrodes,required number of
measurements and the range over which profiles could be ret -
reived.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
I would like to thank Dr.Y.Abdalla for many valuable discuss-
ions and comments.
984
EAR RR c sme ^ sue NM