= 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
ier 1 65 } : 4 
21) and 46 (a) (b) 
an exact L ; els ] 
orrection 44 | 3 1 7 K 
present 8 55 | & ut j 
thms, an 203 ; ] > 
1 : a D a 
es of a 40 } 3 pu J 50 | e J 
he "2 s xv 1 T 5 P 
0.132) s SÉ G wt B 7 ] 
e NEW 36175 As ] E « 
& ue S 
3 QE 40 > [2 = 
the 34 a Pl À a 
question 32 E J 35 + J 
for the P(443nn). using NEW algorithm P(520nm) using NEW algorithm 
30 : 1 L 30 L L i 1 1 L 1 
piomenced 30 32 34 36 3B 40 42 ^44 46 48 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 é5 
> OLD and etr (e) 4 18 | di 4 
a which £ 7 B 
60 | = Pd 1 = 3 
bel 3! Ll 16 + i e 
ne 55 "d A - sut 
F 1 / > 
of the 3 "A a BE LS 
be, DU 0 £P 
50 > 2 a 1 = 
ues. For 3 £z ' 12 a / 
stants. = = M : = t 
45 t / A 
aken from 5 10 - B / 
= © x 
40H x 4 & sy 
> satell- 8 + ^t 
ned from 35 | A 
Fig- P(550nm) using NEW algorithm 6 P(670nm) using NEW algorithm 
vely. 1 A 4. 1 1 A 1 a 4 i A & 4 + 
old and 30 35 40 4 50 S 6 65 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 
lations: Figure 2. The water-leaving radiance as a percentage of the 
satellite-sensed radiance obtained from two algorithms. 
Figs. (a) to (d) correspond to the CZCS channels 1 to 4 
(3) respectively. 
R is the T 1 T T T T T 
ad y are 
3 the 0.85 + J 
2 CZCS 
lotted 0.80 | | 
stion of £ 
jares i 5 
alation 0.75} 7 ao P dud 
a tT UR Figure 3. The ratio P(443nm) / 
2) o.7o |. 2 MM P(550nm) obtained from two 
respect- 3 IU 7 algorithms. 
Thus, $ E 
E3219. 0.65 2 2 { 
the para- f 5 
1 on this 0.60 L 3 J 
0.55 + J 
rious P(443nm)/P(550nm) using NEW algorithm 
0.50 d uk Ad ri A À. A 
Some 0.50 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 
method 
di tion 
refer- 
which 
703