References
1. Valerie. L. Thomas, Generation and Physical Characterristics of »
the Landsat 1 and 2 MSS Computer Compatible Tapes, Goddard Spa-
“ -cen Flight Center. :
2. Patrick F. Holkenbrink, Manual on Characteristics of Landsat
Computer-Compatible Tapes Produced by the EROS Data Center
Digital Image Processing System, United States Geological Sur-
vey 1978
5. Dieter Steiner and Michael E. Kirby, Geometrical Referencing of
Landsat Images by Affine Transformation and Overlaying of Map
Data, Photogrammetria 33 (1977) 41-75.
4, Francis J. Ahern and Jennifer Murphy, Radiometric Calibration
and Correction of Landsat 1, 2, and 3 MSS Data, Canada Center
for Remote Sensing Energy Mines and Resources, Ottawa.
5, K. S. Fu, Digital Pattern Recognition, Springer-verlay Berlin
Heicklberg New York, 1980.
6. David Landgrebe, Computer-Based Remote Sensing Technology-A Look
to the Future, Hemote Sensing of Environment 5,229-246 (1976).
7. Jack Bryant, On the Clustering of Multidimensional Pictorial
Data, Pattern Recognition Vol.11 PP 115-125.
8. Z. Kalensky, ERTS Thematic Map from Multidate Digital Images,
Prcceeding Symposium on Remote Sensing and Photo Interpretation
Vol.2.
9. L. Borriello and F. Capozza, A Clustering Algoritnm for Unsuper-
vised Crop Classification, CCATA, Bari, Italy.
10. Torleiv Orhaug and S Ingvar Akersten, Digital Processing of
Multispectral Data, FOA Repport C30075-E1.
11. Beguin H. Do Tu H, and Wilmet. J, Comparison of Classification:
Methods for Urban Images Interpretation,XIV Congress of the
International Society of Photogrammetry, Commission VII.
12. Torleiv Orhaug, Leif Wastenson and S Ingvar Akersten, Forest
Inventory Using Landsat Digital Imagery, FOA Repport A30008-E1.
13, We A, Davis and F. G. Pett, The Identification and Reclassifica-.
tion of Small Regions on Digital Thematic Maps, Forest Manage-
ment Institute Information Report FMR-X-90.
^4. Z. Kalensky and L. R. Scherlr, Accuracy of Forest Mapping from
Landsat Computer Compatible Tapes.
Les mé
détection sc
considèrent
le contenue
Dans c
révèle être
ces méthodes
L'inty
=. à
difficultés
a
classificat!
Class”
mainly mult
as isolated.
does not ap|
When >
results give
ted.
Intro«
mitting to !
also yielde
tion.
