. further 
his year 
le flight 
c, high- 
channel 
12.8 m 
| of the 
s in the 
quality 
nificant 
latform 
sor data 
1 as an 
) global 
Fetal. 
inflight 
| in the 
e elec- 
X these 
esponse 
ock and 
/IS/NIR 
system 
Id-wide 
on from 
a swath 
ensitive 
id near 
983/84 
nent of 
  
  
égetation | 
  
  
  
  
  
  
atmospheric 
windows 
  
  
  
  
Fig. 1: Comparison of different Earth Observation Satellite Sensors 
21 
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B6. Vienna 1996