Introduction of GIS - A Strategic Decision
Dr.-Ing. Franz Steidler
born & partner AG
Information technology for people
Langhagweg 6
CH 8600 Dübendorf, Zürich, Switzerland
ISPRS-Congress Vienna 1996, IUSM session GIS/LIS
Invited paper
KEY WORDS: GIS, strategy, requirements, work processes, objectives
ABSTRACT
The introduction of a Geographic Information System requires various aspects of consideration. Although in many cases technical
criteria may be fulfilled, GIS projects fail because their objectives had not been clearly defined or were non-existent. GIS is
generally a decision making tool. Various forms of information are coupled together for the purpose of providing a wide range of
efficient analyses.
To make a GIS introduction a success, the goals of the organisation must be analysed. From these results, the objectives of all
concerned departmental levels are derived. This process leads to the requirements of the system to be introduced. Furthermore the
business and work processes must be analysed as they relate to the GIS application. This process requires a broad acceptance by all
end users and top management. This acceptance is the most important precondition for a successful project. This paper will discuss
the combination of strategic and technical aspects for the successful introduction of a Geographic Information System.
KURZFASSUNG
Die Einführung eines Geografischen Informationssystems hat nach unterschiedlichen Gesichtspunkten zu erfolgen. Obwohl
vielfach technische Kriterien erfüllt werden, scheitern GIS Projekte, da ihre Ziele nicht klar definiert wurden oder gar nicht
existieren. GIS ist ein Werkzeug zur Entscheidungsfindung. Unterschiedliche Arten von Informationen werden für weitreichende
und umfassende Analysen zusammengefaßt.
Um eine GIS Einführung erfolgreich durchzuführen, müssen die Ziele der Organisation analysiert werden. Aus diesen werden die
Ziele der untergeordneten Bereiche abgeleitet, woraus auf die Anforderungen an das GIS geschlossen wird. Darüber hinaus müssen
Geschäfts- und Arbeitsprozesse mit ihrem rüumlichen Bezug in die Evaluation mit einbezogen werden. Dies erfordert eine
Akzeptanz auf breiter Ebene vom Endanwender bis zum Top-Management. Diese Akzeptanz ist die wichtigste Voraussetzung für
den Erfolg. Im folgenden wird die Kombination strategischer und technischer Aspekte für eine erfolgreiche GIS-Einführung
besprochen.
availability of relational data base management systems has
1. INTRODUCTION played an immense role.
Now in the information technology age, the possibilities of GIS
are immensely expanding due to the accessibility of various
diversified data sources found in many distributed locations.
This has resulted in transforming a GIS from a documentation
tool into a decision making tool. The management of medium
and larger size organisations are able to use GIS for monitoring
and advancing their strategic and organisational objectives.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have been
commercially availably since the early eighties. They
originated as systems primarily used for the documentation and
cartographic representation of spatially related information
especially related to surveying, cadastral and utility
applications. The decision to introduce a GIS in an
organisation was founded by the demand for the automation of
manual workflows. The initiative was taken by EDP
departments which were capable of handling large software
systems.
Still many GIS projects fail. Very often the involved people do
not really understand why. In most cases it was mistakably
believed , that it was the fault of the software manufacturer for
not providing the necessary tools. The truth is they fail because
of many reasons. These reasons are not necessarily on the side
of the software vendor. This paper discusses these reasons and
shows ways to overcome problems.
Once a GIS was introduced to application departments, the
initiative was transferred to people which possessed a wide
knowledge in the usage of GIS. This was supported by great
improvements in hardware and software technology where the
80
International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Vol. XXXI, Part B6. Vienna 1996
Fora
differ
distin
The
categ
accor
respo
The :
introc
poten
of co
team
not c
back
inclue
to rec
to m
respo
degre
more
The ;
and «
proje
probl
confl;
exper
mana
Lasth
inter-
GIS 1
The 1
The |
capat
new
from
users
mode
ment:
are o
ment
ment.
At s
softw.
point
may
negle
level.