mode and by atomic force microscopy convinced us that the second source of bias should be the most! Mikro
important in the present case. For example, Figure 5.a shows the AFM image of a polished/etched surface’ phase
presenting two 0 lamellae in the y matrix. The two depth-of-etching profiles reported in Figure 5.b
illustrate that the etching is not homogeneous over each of the two phases, but that it is more efficient in .
the y phase near the 8/y interface. In consequence, the less-reflective (dark) area width can be more than M. Ham
fourfold wider than the actual size of the lamella. This also explains why the analysis bias appears erratic Lex
from one sample to another, since it strongly depends on the morphology of the 6 particles: for a given
actual § phase volume fraction, the more acicular the particles, the larger the estimated volume fraction.
b hsp 77 Ee reek reneonva area he i bri:
: Lo Cat oe
d 100 : bei dene
Jase
50, ; - N an
" position (micron) "8 " Sn
h 200 . VEXATETTE phase €
t tess-reflective area zeigen
P 150 hy
e EINES N
d Aa Han
100 des Her
50 . . or
7 position (micron) ram-Iner
Fig. 5 : a) AFM image of the polished/etched surface of an Inconel 718 sample ; b) depth of-etching gir
profiles along the AB (up) and CD (down) lines. 3
Conclusions N Mi
- we propose to use quantitative analysis of BSEM images to measure Vv(S) with good accuracy. MR S
- qualitative comparison of samples on the basis of Vv(S) values measured by LM image analysis is very Te '
hazardous if the morphology of 5 particles can change from one sample to another (as for instance ©"
between Fig. 2.a and 2.b). von ZU
The use of AFM to characterise the topology of the surfaces observed is a powerful approach to
understand the origin of measurement bias and to improve surface preparation. Finleit
Acknowledgements en Metall
Authors are indebted to N. Maloufi from LETAM, Metz, who performed the AFM image acquisition oe
References Versch
1. C.T. Sims, N.S. Stoloff, W.C. Hagel, "Superalloys II" d. John Wiley and Sons (1987) wT
2. M. Sundararaman, P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Banerjee, Metall. Trans. 23A (1992) 2015-2028 ZU Fas
3. Fullprof version 3.5d oct.98, J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, CEA-CNRS ter, da
4. Aphelion version 3.0, ADCIS S.A., Caen, FRANCE her
Prozeß
278