LIBERAL EDUCATION IN LAW, MEDICINE, AND THEOLOGY. 115
hit;
n an
ught
yS we
€, to
nits
edge
hich
Sys-
arate
rant
more
assent
reful
sub-
rac-
nan
not
sical
He
will
1g of
pure
Jical
will
dent
rund
,nese
d, 18
and
nust
and
sut a
a all
wing
any
the
the
arial
sical
» the
urst-
1t no
irst-rate lawyer can be made by merely technical training, no lawyer of
mastery and real resource. General principles learned memoriter ave as
1seless for mastery as precedents learned memoriter. No man shall com-
mand them who does not know whence they came, and what like occa-
sions must be made to yield new principles alike to bar and bench. Such
s the practitioner who is armed cap-a-pie, to be feared by every opponent
'n the mere matter of winning cases. How shall a man who knows noth-
ing of history, of economics, or of political science ever know more than
'he technical rules of the law, which must for him be rules dead, inflexi-
ble, final ?
All this is plain enough, at least to every liberally educated man, and
to every one who considers first of all the good of the community and the
advancement of the professions. But immediate self-interest, haste to
get at the pecuniary rewards of his profession, to make a supporting busi-
ness of it, will make the individual indifferent to these larger considera-
tions. He is willing to leave the higher reaches of his calling to those
who have time to seek them. The physician is content to be a successful
»mpiric, and learn useful practical lessons from his daily experience. The
minister is satisfied if he please his congregation by agreeable sermons
and still more agreeable pastoral visits. The lawyer does not aspire to be
more than an expert in a technical business. As many will go without a
«liberal education ” as the community will permit to do so. Public
opinion does not act imperatively in the matter, because not all of the
public, at any rate here in the United States, has made up its mind that a
general training need precede professional training. Some communities
sven seem inclined to boast of their ¢‘ born” preachers, and their lawyers
who have gained admission to the bar after only six weeks’ study. There
is among us a somewhat general skepticism as to the efficacy of college
nstruction, and a very widely diffused belief in the sufficiency of natural
endowments. And, of course, no one will claim that the colleges give a
man all, or even any considerable part, of what he should have by way of
squipment for one of the learned professions. All that we can say is that
the colleges can give him the point of view, the outlook and the habit of
mind, of the scholar; that, without an ¢ antecedent liberal education,”
not one man in a thousand will have the studies he ought to undertake so
much as suggested to him. His little world will be flat, not round, shut
1 by an encompassing sea, bounded by the near horizon. A professional
man ought to have a liberal education, if only to make him aware of his
(imitations, careful not to blunder into fields of which he knows that he
is ignorant.
The practical side of this question is certainly a very serious one in this
country. That there should be an almost absolute freedom of occupa-
tion is a belief very intimately and tenaciously connected with the demo-
cratic theory of government, and our legislators are very slow to lay many