at
st
et
at
Ae
iS
te
Sa
S
1
S
n
Ni
xd
Ww
by
18
Ad
y
d
i:
12
1e
48
oS
\/
2
i=
dT
Je
iS
ue
n
8
3S
dl
re
41
0)
IMPORTANCE OF THE ABSTHETIC AIM IN DRAWING. 465
me, of their danger. For the study of drawing is really a much simpler
matter than we seem to think. There is an object or a pattern that is
simple and interesting. Look at it, and see if you can make a drawing
that will recall its appearance or convey some notion of its form and
character, some idea of its proportions, some hint of the grace that is in
its lines, if there is any grace there. Until you can do this, no matter
how old you are or how long you have been at it, it will not be of much
ase to try to teach you the historical styles, or the making of working
drawings or ‘geometric views,” whatever that may mean ; you need not
sother your head with perspective, and all the original designs you can
make will amount to nothing at all, or next to nothing.
To draw a thing well is to convey by means of a drawing a fair idea of
the qualities that distinguish it from other things, to portray its character,
io emphasize and celebrate, if you please, the essential truths on which its
appearance depends. This means, I think, that the object studied should
have a definite and distinct character to begin with ; that it should not
be commonplace or uninteresting, but should be something whose appear-
ance would seem to deserve this kind of perpetuation and celebration ;
and, as I have already tried to show, it seems to me that the one quality
whose embodiment in all sorts of available objects for study is freest
from technical or other complications, and whose message to the mind of
the student is likely to be most direct and most universally profitable, is
beauty, and I believe there was never a time when the duty of proclaiming
his kind of truth was greater than it is at present.
The tendency to exalt the commonplace, to celebrate the insignificant,
is one of the most striking faults of the art of to-day. It will bear repeating
on all sorts of occasions that it is our duty to ‘“love the highest,” and
that it is the business of art to help us cherish noble ideals. Now the
opposite of all this in drawing, as in all sorts of craftsmanship, is the
mechanical babit. It is this that is to be dreaded and discouraged.
Please do not misunderstand me. I am not saying anything against
.nechanical trades, against the use of tools and instruments of any kind.
[ am speaking of that habit of mind which, for want of a better term, we
2all mechanical, because, like the work of a machine—however accurate,
ind even delicate, it may be—it is not self-directed, and its product is not
the embodiment of an original conception.
If we abandon or neglect the art idea we are pretty sure to pin our
faith to the mechanical one, to attach undue importance to mere accuracy
and to qualities that can be tested by rule and level. This habit cramps
the mind instead of expanding it ; tends to make it timid and dependent,
to rely on precedent and authority instead of seeking original sources of
terest and power. But if the merely exact and mechanical is to be
objected to, the merely natural is quite as carefully to be avoided ; and
perhaps, on the whole, the grossness of nature-worship is more to be dreaded
30