/
THE MASS-LUMINOSITY RELATION
169
by the same transformation as used in deriving B from A. The pressures
will be transformed in the ratio l~ A and therefore in the same ratio as pT.
The perfect gas law is obeyed, except that the constant of proportionality
between p G and pT is modified by the electrostatic forces, so that we have
p G = aftpT/p (115-1),
where a is the same throughout the homologous series and depends only
on the mass of the star. Since p only appears in the astronomical formulae
through this equation for p G , the effect of electrostatic forces is very
simply taken into account by substituting a fictitious molecular weight
p/a instead of p in our formulae.
It is true that the star B could not actually be a precise copy of A
because at the different temperature and density the ionisation would be
slightly altered. The ionisation depends on other than inverse-square
forces and is therefore not purely a function of pjT 3 . Thus B 0 would not
be strictly homologous to A 0 ; but no more is B (without electrostatic
forces) strictly homologous to A. The differences are no greater than those
that have previously been neglected.
116. The investigation of the magnitude of the electrostatic forces is
taken up in Chapter x. We shall find that they are comparatively small
and have little effect on the mass-luminosity curve, except that they
appear to be responsible for about half of the difference between the line
of the observations and the theoretical curve on the left of Fig. 2. They
make the gas superperfect; that is to say, the pressure is less than in a
perfect gas, whereas the deviations familiar in terrestrial gases make the
pressure greater.
At first sight it seems absurd that we should secure greater com
pressibility—render the atoms less able to ward off one another—by
stripping them of their electrons and thereby exposing the large repulsive
forces of their nuclei which were previously shielded. But the electrons
set free by ionisation are not removed ; they wander among the ions and
shield their repulsions very much as they did when they were bound. The
mystery really lies in the origin of the forces corresponding to the rigidity
of the atoms, which seem to be much greater than any electrostatic
repulsions in the small region in which they act.
The following calculation is intended solely to allay the idea that the
electrostatic forces will, by creating around an ion a large region im
penetrable to other ions, give it an effective volume sufficient to produce
large effects. In order to take the most favourable case, consider a small
star like Krueger 60, which at a more or less average point has a tempera
ture 2-5.10 7 and a density 360. If the material is iron there will be
3-9.10 24 ions per cu. cm. giving an average separation of 0-64.10“ 8 cm.
The charge of an ion retaining 3 electrons is 23e and two such ions at