Variable Stars
383
353-355]
are probably some 100 million stars. Shapley * finds that only about 50 known
Cepheids lie within this distance of the sun. Thus probably only about one
star in a million is a Cepheid variable.
The proportion of long-period variables is necessarily even smaller, since
less than one star in a million has the luminosity of the long-period variables
and of the stars of the requisite luminosity only a fraction are variables. At
a guess perhaps about one star in ten millions is a long-period variable.
355. In searching for a clue to the physical interpretation of variability
we naturally consider first whether it is the effect of some peculiar accident
which happens only to a few stars, or whether it is a normal condition which
affects all or many stars in the course of their natural development.
The only accidents which we can imagine are of the nature of collisions or
of close approaches by other stars. Calculations have shewn (§ 286) that actual
collisions must be excessively rare, while encounters at distances close enough
to produce physical effects in the stars can be only one degree less so. It is
difficult to estimate for how long the effects of a collision or encounter would
continue to produce a variation in a star’s light, but unless we allow a very
long period indeed the number of variable stars in the sky would appear to be
too great for such an origin to be assigned to their variability. Moreover, stars
of all masses and of all luminosities would be equally liable to accidents of
this type, so that, on this hypothesis, it would be hard to explain why, as a
rule, only stars of high mass and high luminosity shew variability. On the
other hand, it should not be overlooked that the cluster-variables are especially
frequent in globular star-clusters (from which they take their name), and that
in these the stars are packed so closely that near encounters must be far
more frequent than in the galactic system as a whole.
Nevertheless, surveying the question as a whole, it seems very improbable
that variability can be attributed to the occurrence of an accident, and we seem'
forced to conclude that it is more of the nature of a passing phase in the
normal development either of every star or at least of a considerable proportion
of stars. In favour of this view is the circumstance that most, and possibly
all, of the if-type giants of high luminosity are found to be long-period
variables. This of itself would almost suffice to rule out the accident theory,
at least in its application to long-period variables.
If variability is a phase in the development of the normal star, the figures
given above shew that it must be of short duration. If a star’s average life is
10 13 years, and only one star in a million is variable at any given instant, then
variability can only last for about 10 7 years. Hertzsprungf finds that the
period of the typical Cepheid variable 8 Cephei is decreasing at the rate of a
tenth of a second per annum. This rate of decrease would reduce the present
* Astrophys. Journ. xLvm. (1928), p. 279, or Mt Wilson Contribution, No. 151.
f Observatory, xlti. (1919), p. 338.